ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020
Fecal Microbiota Transfer.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodological insights into fecal microbiota transplantation: Dissecting key approaches for success.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: from empirical remedy to precision medicine.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients with Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis: A Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Androbactome and the Gut Microbiota-Testis Axis: A Narrative Review of Emerging Insights into Male Fertility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Non-ToxigenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- [Urinary bladder microbiome analysis and probiotic treatment options for women with recurrent urinary tract infections].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2022Review
- Article
- New Opportunities for Endometrial Health by Modifying Uterine Microbial Composition: Present or Future?Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Microbiota-directed biotherapeutics: considerations for quality and functional assessment.Gut microbesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is increasingly being used in Ger- many, as in other countries, for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). FMT is now being performed both for research and in individual patients outside of clinical trials. No compulsory standards have been established to date for donor screening or for the method of fecal transfer. Given the potential dangers of FMT, this would seem to be urgently necessary.
methodsThis review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search, including the reports of consensus conferences from Germany and abroad.
resultsBecause of its high efficacy, FMT is the treatment of choice for rCDI. It is largely free of adverse side effects, even in immune-deficient patients, as long as comprehensive and repeated donor screening has been carried out, with extensive clinical and microbiological testing and with the use of structured questionnaires. The ingestion of frozen, encapsulated microbiota is just as effective as other modes of delivery for the treatment of rCDI.
conclusionEncapsulation of the fecal microbiome (FM) and storage at -20°C is the method of choice, because it can be standardized with the necessary quality controls and it is readily available. Patients with rCDI should undergo FMT by orally ingesting the capsules. There are ongoing research efforts to identify the active e FM. It is not yet clear when the ultimate goal of recombinant production can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.