Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32031448›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Optimal Cancer Care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: A Shared Approach to System Level Change.

Jennifer Chynoweth, Meaghan M McCambridge, Helen M Zorbas, Jacinta K Elston, Robert J S Thomas, William J H Glasson, Joanna M Coutts, Barbara A Daveson, Kathryn M Whitfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Indigenous Australians' Experiences of Cancer Care: A Narrative Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Communicating cancer and its treatment to Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer ChynowethCancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
Meaghan M McCambridgeCancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
Helen M ZorbasCancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
Jacinta K ElstonMonash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Robert J S ThomasUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
William J H GlassonTerrace Eye Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Joanna M CouttsCancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
Barbara A DavesonCancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
Kathryn M WhitfieldDepartment of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Cancer Australia · AUCity Eye Centre · AUDepartment of Health and Human Services · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo improve cancer outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people through the development and national endorsement of the first population-specific optimal care pathway (OCP) to guide the delivery of high-quality, culturally appropriate, and evidence-based cancer care.

methodsAn iterative methodology was undertaken over a 2-year period, and more than 70 organizations and individuals from diverse cultural, geographic, and sectorial backgrounds provided input. Cancer Australia reviewed experiences of care and the evidence base and undertook national public consultation with the indigenous health sector and community, health professionals, and professional colleges. Critical to the OCP development was the leadership of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health experts and consumers.

resultsThe OCP received unanimous endorsement by all federal, state, and territory health ministers. Key elements of the OCP include attention to the cultural appropriateness of the health care environment; improvement in cross-cultural communication; relationship building with local community; optimization of health literacy; recognition of men's and women's business; and the need to use culturally appropriate resources. The OCP can be used as a tool for health services and health professionals to identify gaps in current cancer services and to inform quality improvement initiatives across all aspects of the care pathway.

conclusionThe development of the OCP identified a number of areas that require prioritization. Ensuring culturally safe and accessible health services is essential to support early presentation and diagnosis. Multidisciplinary treatment planning and patient-centered care are required for all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, irrespective of location. Health planners and governments acknowledge the imperative for change and have expressed strong commitment to work with indigenous Australians to improve the accessibility, cultural appropriateness, and quality of cancer care.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousNeoplasmsAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMen

Identifiers

PMID32031448
PMCPMC6998013
OpenAlexW2999695279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.