Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32031447›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Creating a Canadian Indigenous Research Network Against Cancer to Address Indigenous Cancer Disparities.

Angeline Letendre, Gail Garvey, Alexandra King, Malcolm King, Reg Crowshoe, Lea Bill, Nadine R Caron, Brenda Elias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Angeline LetendreAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gail GarveyMenzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alexandra KingUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Malcolm KingUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Reg CrowshoePiikani First Nation, Alberta, Canada.
Lea BillAlberta First Nation Information Governance Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nadine R CaronUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Brenda EliasUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CAAlberta Health Services · CAAssembly of First Nations · CAMenzies School of Health Research · AUUniversity nuhelot'ine thaiyots'i nistameyimâkanak Blue Quills · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Canada, indigenous peoples' cancer rates have increased, but cancer screening rates tend to be lower. When coupled with poor cancer prognosis, treatment barriers, and inaccessible health care, indigenous patients with cancer experience many unmet needs. Further complicating their journey is a multijurisdictional system that complicates cancer control services, treatments, patient supports, and cancer surveillance. To address these issues, the Canadian Indigenous Research Network Against Cancer (CIRNAC) was developed. This article describes the forerunners and consultative process that created the network and the consensus model developed to ground this network with, by, and for indigenous peoples.

methodsA consultative workshop was held to (1) establish and increase network membership, (2) enhance partnerships with indigenous communities and other researchers, and (3) develop an indigenous-led research program, new funding, and related initiatives.

resultsParticipants viewed the CIRNAC as a reflective parallel network led by indigenous peoples that would identify research priorities within Canada, assess how these priorities align with indigenous patients' cancer care and research needs, and cross-check to see if these priorities align with each other. The network would also advocate for indigenous elders/knowledge holders and community grassroot processes to drive research and training, thus demonstrating the power of the community voice and lived experience in research. In addition, the network would foster research partnerships to investigate alternative indigenous models for cancer prevention, care, treatment, and support.

conclusionThe CIRNAC evolved as a viable vehicle to address cancer with, for, and by indigenous peoples. The network is guided by a preamble, a set of aims, and an inclusion engagement circle model. It is evolving through major world initiatives, with the aim of formally becoming an internationally linked national network.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousNeoplasmsAgedCanadaDelivery of Health CareHumansPopulation Groups

Identifiers

PMID32031447
PMCPMC6998023
OpenAlexW3000460973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.