Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030735›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2020

Regional anaesthesia practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery.

R A Armstrong, C Wilson, L Elliott, C A Fielding, C A Rogers, F J Caskey, R J Hinchliffe, R Mouton, L Rooshenas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The 'Wirral Wedge': an aid to position arm safely in upper limb surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R A ArmstrongBristol School of Anaesthesia, Bristol, UK.
C WilsonPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
L ElliottBristol Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
C A FieldingTrainee Advanced Clinical Practitioner, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
C A RogersTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
F J CaskeyPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
R J HinchliffeBristol Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
R MoutonDepartment of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
L RooshenasPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews to investigate current anaesthetic practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery in the UK. Responses were received from 39 out of 59 vascular centres where arteriovenous access surgery is performed, a response rate of 66%. Thirty-five centres reported routine use of brachial plexus blocks, but variation in anaesthetic skill-mix and practice were observed. Interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians from 10 NHS Trusts including anaesthetists, vascular access and renal nurses, surgeons and nephrologists. Thematic analysis identified five key findings: (1) current anaesthetic practice showed that centres could be classified as 'regional anaesthesia dominant' or 'local anaesthesia/mixed'; (2) decision making around mode of anaesthesia highlighted the key role of surgeons as frontline decision makers across both centre types; (3) perceived barriers and facilitators of regional block use included clinicians' beliefs and preferences, resource considerations and patients' treatment preferences; (4) anaesthetists' preference for supraclavicular blocks emerged, alongside acknowledgement of varied practice; (5) there was widespread support for a future randomised controlled trial, although clinician equipoise issues and logistical/resource-related concerns were viewed as potential challenges. The use of regional anaesthesia for arteriovenous fistula formation in the UK is varied and influenced by a multitude of factors. Despite the availability of anaesthetists capable of performing regional blocks, there are other limiting factors that influence the routine use of this technique. The study also highlighted the perceived need for a large multicentre, randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base to inform current practice.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, LocalAnesthesiologistsAnesthetistsArteriovenous FistulaBrachial Plexus BlockClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansMaleSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomVascular Surgical Proceduresarteriovenous fistula formationregional anaesthesiaupper extremity nerve blocksvascular access

Identifiers

PMID32030735
PMCPMC7187449
OpenAlexW3004629806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.