Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030723›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2020

A feasibility study of microwave therapy for precancerous actinic keratosis.

D N Jackson, F J Hogarth, D Sutherland, E M Holmes, P T Donnan, C M Proby

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Needleless administration of advanced therapies into the skin via the appendages using a hypobaric patch.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Cryotherapy for Actinic Keratosis: Basic Principles and Literature Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D N JacksonDepartment of Dermatology, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3936-1781
F J HogarthTayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.
D SutherlandClinical Research Centre, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.
E M HolmesDundee Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.
P T DonnanDundee Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.
C M ProbyDepartment of Dermatology, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-4836
University of Dundee · GBNHS Tayside · GB

Funding

Emblation LtdInnovate UK 103352NHS TaysideUniversity of Dundee
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActinic keratosis (AK) is a common premalignant skin lesion that can progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Microwave therapy is an established cancer treatment and has been used for plantar viral warts.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of microwave as a treatment for AK.

methodsStage I was a dose-setting study, in which seven participants had the dielectric properties of 12 thick and 22 thin AKs assessed for optimization of the microwave dose used for treatment in Stage II. Stage II was a randomized, internally controlled trial evaluating 179 AKs in 11 patients (93 treated, 86 untreated controls) on the scalp/forehead or dorsal hand. Participants received one treatment initially and a repeat treatment to unresolved AKs at week 4. The response was assessed at six visits over 4 months. The primary outcome was partial or complete resolution of the treated AKs.

resultsA significantly higher proportion of treated AK areas responded than untreated (90% vs. 15%; P < 0·001). Thin AKs were more responsive than thick AKs. The site did not affect efficacy. Pain was severe, but brief (80% reported pain lasting 'a few seconds only'). Adverse effects were minimal (erythema, n = 6; flaking, n = 3; itch, n = 3). All participants who would chose microwave therapy over their current treatment cited the shorter discomfort period.

conclusionsMicrowave therapy is a portable, safe and effective treatment for AK. An easy-to-deliver, acceptable therapy for AK is attractive as a prevention strategy. While these results are promising, a larger randomized controlled trial is needed against an effective comparator to confirm clinical efficacy and patient acceptability. What is already known about this topic? Actinic keratoses (AKs) are common precancerous skin lesions. Successful treatment of AK can prevent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Most topical therapies for AK require repeated application over weeks and drive local skin inflammation, leading to poor compliance. An easy-to-deliver and effective treatment for AK, suitable for use in primary care, could reduce cSCC. What does this study add? Microwave therapy is a feasible, effective treatment for AK. Ninety per cent of treated AKs showed full or partial resolution at 120 days post-treatment. Microwave therapy was painful, but the pain was short-lived (seconds) and this short discomfort period was cited as the main reason that microwave was preferred to their current treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellKeratosis, ActinicSkin NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansMicrowavesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32030723
PMCPMC7496712
OpenAlexW3004719290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.