Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030606›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020

Compatibility of two predator species for biological control of the two-spotted spider mite.

Morgana Maria Fonseca, Angelo Pallini, Pedro Hermano Marques, Eraldo Lima, Arne Janssen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Morgana Maria FonsecaDepartment of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Angelo PalliniDepartment of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Pedro Hermano MarquesDepartment of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eraldo LimaDepartment of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Arne JanssenDepartment of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. arne.janssen@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-5303
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because predators may interfere with each other, an important step towards the implementation of successful release of multiple predators in biocontrol programs requires resolving how predators respond to the presence of heterospecific competitors. Several species of predatory mites are important biocontrol agents and the species Phytoseiulus macropilis and Neoseiulus californicus are used to control the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, an important pest in agriculture worldwide. We investigated their compatibility showing that the two predators do not avoid plants on which the other species is present together with their common prey, and demonstrated that their oviposition rates are not affected by the presence of the other species. However, the distribution of the eggs on leaf discs was affected by the presence of the heterospecific predator. This behaviour might weaken possible interference between these two biocontrol agents, which, in turn, may enable their persistence on plants and favour pest suppression. The increased joint use of several natural enemies for biological control highlights the importance of studies on predator-predator interactions.

Indexed as

Biological Control AgentsPest Control, BiologicalPredatory BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMitesOvipositionPlant LeavesTetranychidaeBiological Control AgentsAugmentative biological controlInterspecific competitionMultiple predatorsPhytoseiidaeVolatile chemical cues

Identifiers

PMID32030606
OpenAlexW3008059992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.