Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030561›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2020

Locally advanced rectal cancer: 3D diffusion-prepared stimulated-echo turbo spin-echo versus 2D diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging.

Qinwei Zhang, Petra J van Houdt, Doenja M J Lambregts, Baukelien van Triest, Marnix P M Kop, Bram F Coolen, Gustav J Strijkers, Uulke A van der Heide, Aart J Nederveen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qinwei ZhangAmsterdam UMC, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Room Z0-178, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands. q.zhang@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-8164
Petra J van HoudtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Doenja M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Baukelien van TriestDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marnix P M KopAmsterdam UMC, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Room Z0-178, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bram F CoolenAmsterdam UMC, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gustav J StrijkersAmsterdam UMC, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Uulke A van der HeideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Aart J NederveenAmsterdam UMC, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Room Z0-178, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown great value in rectal cancer imaging. However, traditional DWI with echo-planar imaging (DW-EPI) often suffers from geometrical distortions. We applied a three-dimensional diffusion-prepared stimulated-echo turbo spin-echo sequence (DPsti-TSE), allowing geometrically undistorted rectal DWI. We compared DPsti-TSE with DW-EPI for locally advanced rectal cancer DWI.

methodsFor 33 prior-to-treatment patients, DWI images of the rectum were acquired with DPsti-TSE and DW-EPI at 3 T using b-values of 200 and 1000 s/mm

resultsDPsti-TSE scored significantly better than DW-EPI in rectum distortion (p = 0.005) and signal pileup (p = 0.001). DPsti-TSE had better tumour Dice similarity coefficient compared to DW-EPI (0.84 versus 0.80, p = 0.010). Tumour ADC values were higher for DPsti-TSE compared to DW-EPI (1.47 versus 0.86 × 10

conclusionsDPsti-TSE provided geometrically less distorted rectal cancer diffusion-weighted images. However, the image quality of DW-EPI over DPsti-TSE was referred on the basis of several image quality criteria. A significant bias in tumour ADC values from DPsti-TSE was present. Further improvements of DPsti-TSE are needed until it can replace DW-EPI.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingImaging, Three-DimensionalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingEcho-planar imagingMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasm stagingRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32030561
PMCPMC7005244
OpenAlexW3010772504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.