Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030508›Full record

Trial reportActa diabetologica2020

Abrogation of postprandial triglyceridemia with dual PPAR α/γ agonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Ashu Rastogi, Richard L Dunbar, Hemant P Thacker, Jayesh Bhatt, Krupi Parmar, Deven V Parmar

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta diabetologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Hypolipidemic effect and mechanism of Hedan tablet based on network pharmacology.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2025
    Article
  7. Hypoglycemic Effects and Quality Marker Screening ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashu RastogiPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Richard L DunbarCardiometabolic and Lipid Clinic, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hemant P ThackerBhatia Hospital, G-1 Block, Tardeo Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400007, India.
Jayesh BhattClinical R&D, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382210, India.
Krupi ParmarClinical R&D, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382210, India.
Deven V ParmarClinical R&D, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382210, India. deven.parmar@zydusdiscovery.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8545-6039
Cadila Healthcare (India) · INBhatia Hospital · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INTower Semiconductor (Israel) · ILTranslational Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLowering postprandial lipemia may mitigate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. This study was aimed to investigate whether saroglitazar suppresses postprandial lipemia in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia.

methodsThis was a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of saroglitazar in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. Thirty patients were randomized (1:1) to receive saroglitazar 4 mg or placebo orally once daily with metformin for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in plasma triglyceride (TG) area under the curve (AUC) on a standardized 8-h fat tolerance test.

resultsThirty participants were randomized for interventions and eventually data of 19 participants qualified for per protocol analyses. Mean (SD) age in saroglitazar was 53.1 (8.8) years and 54.9 (7.7) years in placebo group. After 12 weeks, saroglitazar significantly lowered postprandial TG-AUC by - 458.3 (144.0) (- 25.7%, 95% CI - 765.1 to - 151.4) versus an increase of + 10.9 (157.9) (+ 0.5%, 95% CI - 325.6 to 347.3) mg/dL h in placebo group (P < 0.05). Saroglitazar lowered postprandial TG incremental AUC versus placebo: - 329.4 (89.9) (- 59%) versus + 80.4 (99.4) (+ 10%) mg/dL h (P < 0.05). HbA1c (%) decreased by - 0.36 (0.42) in the saroglitazar group as compared to an increase of + 1.26 (0.46) (P < 0.05) with placebo.

conclusionsThe saroglitazar treatment significantly improved postprandial TGs in people with diabetic dyslipidemia.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry of India; trial Registration No.: CTRI/2015/06/005845 and Date of registration: June 02, 2015.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHyperlipidemiasHypoglycemic AgentsIndiaMaleMetforminMiddle AgedPhenylpropionatesPlacebosPostprandial PeriodPPAR alphaPPAR gammaPyrrolesHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPhenylpropionatesPlacebosPPAR alphaPPAR gammaPyrrolessaroglitazarTriglyceridesClinical trialDiabetesDyslipidemiasPPARsTriglyceride

Identifiers

PMID32030508
OpenAlexW3005355570

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.