Article3 Biotech2020
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for non-marine molluscs: is modified CTAB DNA extraction method more efficient than DNA extraction kits?
Article in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA Extraction Optimisation for Minute Land Snails ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Modular integration of nanopore sequencing, alphafold modeling, and statistical design boosts 1-hydroxyphenazine yield in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain KAEH25.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Rapid Detection of Animal-Derived Components in Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genome Assemblies of Indrella ampulla, a Terrestrial Gastropod Endemic to the Western Ghats.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Combination of Sample Preservation Approaches and DNA Extraction Methods for Long-Read Sequencing of Nudibranchs' Genomes.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Optimizing a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide protocol for fungal DNA extraction: Insights from multilocus gene amplification.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Genome-wide analysis of MYB family genes inPlant direct · 2022Article
- Assessment of Psyllid Handling and DNA Extraction Methods in the Detection of 'Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Comparability of CMV DNA Extraction Methods and Validation of Viral Load.Methods and protocols · 2022Article
- Whole genome sequencing of marine organisms by Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Assessment and optimization of HMW-DNA extraction protocols.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Review
- Sticky problems: extraction of nucleic acids from molluscs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Optimization of high molecular weight DNA extraction methods in shrimp for a long-read sequencing platform.PeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolation of high molecular weight DNA from gastropod molluscs and its subsequent PCR amplification is considered difficult due to excessive mucopolysaccharides secretion which co-precipitate with DNA and obstruct successful amplification. In an attempt to address this issue, we describe a modified CTAB DNA extraction method that proved to work significantly better with a number of freshwater and terrestrial gastropod taxa. We compared the performance of this method with Qiagen
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.