Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030245›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and strain elastography of locally advanced breast cancer.

Li-Shuang Gu, Rui Zhang, Yong Wang, Xue-Mei Liu, Fei Ma, Jia-Yu Wang, Xiao-Ying Sun, Meng-Jia Liu, Bo Wang, Shuang-Mei Zou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in breast ductal abnormalities.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Shuang GuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100010, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Xue-Mei LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100010, China.
Fei MaDepartment of Breast Diseases, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jia-Yu WangDepartment of Breast Diseases, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Xiao-Ying SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District, Beijing 100122, China.
Meng-Jia LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Bo WangDepartment of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Shuang-Mei ZouDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNCancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District Beijing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is one of the subgroups of invasive breast cancer. The treatment of LABC is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before surgery, which is different from the others. The study aimed to analyze and compare the characteristics of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and strain elastography (SE) in LABC patients who have different treatment outcomes, and to provide help for LABC in the imaging diagnosis and clinic treatment.

methodsFrom May 2018 to April 2019, 36 patients (40 lesions) of LABC were enrolled, which diagnosed by puncture biopsy. According to the clinical evaluation, these patients were recommended to undergo pre-operative NAC followed by surgery. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE before puncture. According to postoperative pathological grading and follow-up, the patients were divided into effective and ineffective groups. We summarized and compared the features of conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE of patients in two groups. The correlation between the imaging characteristics and the postoperative pathological grading was also analyzed.

resultsConventional ultrasonic features of LABC: the most lesions of LABC were mass type (32/40, 80.0%), and all lesions were irregular. Most of lesions showed unclear boundaries (39/40, 97.5%), heterogeneous echoes (38/40, 95.0%), and internal calcifications (24/40, 60.0%). Most of lesions had hyperechoic halos (31/40, 77.5%), aspect ratio less than or equal to 1 (34/40, 85.0%), and blood flow grading was III (36/40, 90.0%). CEUS features of LABC: compared with the surrounding normal tissues, all the lesions (40/40,100.0%) were highly enhanced. Most of lesions (35/40, 87.5%) were uneven enhanced. The main enhancement mode was "fast in and slow out" (39/40, 97.5%). There were totally 25 lesions which had "solar sign" (25/40, 62.5%). SE features of LABC: the average visual elastography score of the lesions was 4.28±0.67, the maximum strain rate (E1) of the lesions averaged 4.88±0.54, and the overall strain rate of the lesion averaged 4.14±0.72. There was no significant difference between effective and ineffective groups in the characteristics of conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE. There was a correlation between the appearance of "solar sign" in CEUS and postoperative pathological grading, and the contingency coefficient was 0.564 (P<0.05). The pathological grading of patients without solar sign was higher. The other characteristics of conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE in LABC patients had no correlation with postoperative pathological grading.

conclusionsIn LABC, the conventional ultrasound usually shows irregular shape and unclear boundaries. The aspect ratio is less than or equal to 1. CEUS showed uneven enhancement of "fast in and slow out", and "solar sign" was often seen. Elastography showed that the texture of the lesion was significantly stiffer than the surrounding normal tissue. Ultrasound imaging before NAC had no relationship with pathological complete response or not. However, "solar sign" in CEUS was an important feature and had correlation with postoperative pathological grading.

Indexed as

Breast cancercontrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)conventional ultrasoundstrain elastography

Identifiers

PMID32030245
PMCPMC6987994
OpenAlexW2992457703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.