Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030189›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental health science & engineering2019

Factors associated with safe food handling practices in the food service sector.

France Ncube, Artwell Kanda, Mqhele W Mpofu, Tendayi Nyamugure

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

France Ncube1Department of Environmental Science, Bindura University of Science Education, Private Bag 1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-0364-1754
Artwell Kanda1Department of Environmental Science, Bindura University of Science Education, Private Bag 1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
Mqhele W MpofuDepartment of Environmental Health, Gwanda Multi-disciplinary Health Training School, Private Bag 125, Gwanda, Zimbabwe.
Tendayi Nyamugure1Department of Environmental Science, Bindura University of Science Education, Private Bag 1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review assessed the methodological quality of relevant food safety studies, investigated the available evidences for factors associated with safe food handling practices (SFHPs) and suggested required improvements.

methodsA systematic literature search was carried out in five databases. A pre-designed criteria was used for data extraction and quality assessment. Evidence synthesis was performed, based on specified criteria.

resultsOut of a total of 1768 published research articles, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Strong evidence suggests that food handlers' knowledge and attitudes on food safety contribute to SFHPs. Moderate evidence exists about the association between a food handler's food safety training and SFHPs. Limited evidence is available about the influence of the educational level and work experience of a food handler, to SFHPs. Insufficient evidence exists about the association between socio-demographic characteristics and SFHPs. A conceptual framework is presented to illustrate the associations.

conclusionsAvailable evidence supports that in order to promote SFHPs, responsible authorities should focus on improving on the food safety knowledge and attitudes of food handlers. Future food safety studies may richly benefit from overcoming the methodological shortcomings presented in this review.

Indexed as

AttitudesFood contaminationFood handlerFood poisoningFood safetyKnowledge

Identifiers

PMID32030189
PMCPMC6985409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.