Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32030157›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental health science & engineering2019

Effect of immature and mature compost addition on petroleum contaminated soils composting: kinetics.

Mahdi Farzadkia, Ali Esrafili, Mitra Gholami, Ali Koolivand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Genomics, Transcriptome, and Prokaryotic Expression Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahdi Farzadkia1Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Esrafili1Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mitra Gholami1Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Koolivand2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, P.O. BOX: 3818146851 Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-4631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe kinetic studies and effect of amendment addition on the performance of the composting process in reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) from petroleum contaminated soils (PCS) were investigated in the present research.

methodsSeven composting experiments containing various mixing ratios of PCS to unfinished compost (UC) and finished compost (FC) were set up and operated for 14 weeks. The mixing rations consisted of 1:0 (as control experiment), 1:0.3, 1:0.6, and 1:1. The initial C/N/P and moisture contents of the composting piles were adjusted to 100/5/1 and 50-55%, respectively.

resultsResults showed that 50.09-79.49% of TPH was removed in the composting experiments after 14 weeks. The highest and lowest removal rates were achieved in the ratios of 1:1 and 1:0.3, respectively. Moreover, application of UC as amendments and bulking agent is more efficient than FC. The biodecomposition of TPH was fitted to the first-order kinetic with the half lives and rate constants of 5.63-11.55 days and 0.060-0.123 d

conclusionsThe study confirmed the suitability of composting process for PCS bioremediation and superiority of UC than FC as bulking agent.

Indexed as

AmendmentsBioremediationComposting processImmature compostMature compostPetroleum contaminated soil

Identifiers

PMID32030157
PMCPMC6985388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.