ArticleJournal of environmental health science & engineering2019
Adsorptive performance of a mixture of three nonliving algae classes for nickel remediation in synthesized wastewater.
Article in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- New insights into enhancement of cadmium biosorption from industrial wastewater throughRSC advances · 2025Article
- Adsorptive Effect of Corn Silk-Loaded Nickel Oxide and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles for Elimination of Ciprofloxacin from Wastewater.ACS omega · 2025Article
- The biosorption of reactive red dye onto orange peel waste: a study on the isotherm and kinetic processes and sensitivity analysis using the artificial neural network approach.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- A comparative study of using barberry stem powder and ash as adsorbents for adsorption of humic acid.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present study provided a comprehensive description regarding the application of a mixture of three nonliving classes of algae as a promising and inexpensive biosorbent for removing toxic nickel (Ni(II)) ions from the aqueous medium.
methodsThe biosorption process was tested by varying several experimental parameters such as pH (2-8), contaminant concentration (20-300 mg/L), biosorbent content (0.2-2 g/100 mL), and temperature (20-40 °C). In addition, the competition effects of the presence of Pb(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) ions on the Ni(II) removal efficiency was studied by varying their concentrations from 30 to 40 mg/L.
resultsThe microscopic analysis of algae demonstrated that the used biosorbent consisted mainly of Chrysophyta (80%), Chlorophyte (14%), and Cyanophyta (6%). Results demonstrated that these environmental parameters influenced the removal efficiency with a different degree and there was no stable effects rank at conditions under examination. FT-IR and SEM analysis revealed that the biosorbent surface consists of many strong and active groups of negative valences such as hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, thus exhibiting several morphological properties of interest. Further, it was found that the Temkin model best fitted the isotherm biosorption data. The kinetic study showed that the Ni(II) biosorption was rapid within first 20 min of reaction time, thereby following a pseudo-second-order model, which in turn demonstrated a chemisorption process of Ni(II) ions reaction with the biosorbent binding sites. Also, the thermodynamic study suggested that the biosorption process of Ni(II) onto algal biomass was a spontaneous and endothermic in nature. The maximum uptake of Ni(II) was 9.848 mg/g under optimized conditions and neutral environment.
conclusionsThus, this significant finding suggested a favorable and eco-friendly treatment mechanism for removal of Ni(II) ions from aqueous medium via biosorption onto the used mixture of nonliving algal biomass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.