Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Automated high-throughput heartbeat quantification in medaka and zebrafish embryos under physiological conditions.

Jakob Gierten, Christian Pylatiuk, Omar T Hammouda, Christian Schock, Johannes Stegmaier, Joachim Wittbrodt, Jochen Gehrig, Felix Loosli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heart rate control by listening to light.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of Underwater Noise Exposure on Early Development in Zebrafish.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hemodynamics During Development and Postnatal Life.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jakob GiertenDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. jakob.gierten@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Christian PylatiukInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Omar T HammoudaCentre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0502-658X
Christian SchockInstitute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Johannes StegmaierInstitute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Joachim WittbrodtCentre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-7377
Jochen GehrigACQUIFER is a division of DITABIS, Digital Biomedical Imaging Systems AG, Pforzheim, Germany. j.gehrig@acquifer.de.
Felix LoosliInstitute of Biological and Chemical Systems, Biological Information Processing (IBCS-BIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. felix.loosli@kit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of heartbeats in fish models is an important readout to study cardiovascular biology, disease states and pharmacology. However, dependence on anaesthesia, laborious sample orientation or requirement for fluorescent reporters have hampered the use of high-throughput heartbeat analysis. To overcome these limitations, we established an efficient screening assay employing automated label-free heart rate determination of randomly oriented, non-anesthetized medaka (Oryzias latipes) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos in microtiter plates. Automatically acquired bright-field data feeds into an easy-to-use HeartBeat software with graphical user interface for automated quantification of heart rate and rhythm. Sensitivity of the assay was demonstrated by profiling heart rates during entire embryonic development. Our analysis revealed rapid adaption of heart rates to temperature changes, which has implications for standardization of experimental layout. The assay allows scoring of multiple embryos per well enabling a throughput of >500 embryos per 96-well plate. In a proof of principle screen for compound testing, we captured concentration-dependent effects of nifedipine and terfenadine over time. Our novel assay permits large-scale applications ranging from phenotypic screening, interrogation of gene functions to cardiovascular drug development.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEmbryo, NonmammalianHeart RateModels, AnimalMonitoring, PhysiologicNifedipineOryziasProof of Concept StudySoftwareTerfenadineZebrafishNifedipineTerfenadine

Identifiers

PMID32029752
PMCPMC7005164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.