Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029533›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Li-Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Aymar de Rugy, Timothy J Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Meta-learning of human motor adaptation via the dorsal premotor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A software tool for at-home measurement of sensorimotor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the role of task success in implicit motor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li-Ann LeowCentre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072 Queensland, Australia, l.leow@uq.edu.au.
Welber MarinovicSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Bentley, 6102 Western Australia, Australia, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2472-7955
Aymar de RugyInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 5287, Université de Bordeaux, France 33076.
Timothy J CarrollCentre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072 Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-1819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional views of sensorimotor adaptation (i.e., adaptation of movements to perturbed sensory feedback) emphasize the role of automatic, implicit correction of sensory prediction errors. However, latent memories formed during sensorimotor adaptation, manifest as improved relearning (e.g., savings), have recently been attributed to strategic corrections of task errors (failures to achieve task goals). To dissociate contributions of task errors and sensory prediction errors to latent sensorimotor memories, we perturbed target locations to remove or enforce task errors during learning and/or test, with male/female human participants. Adaptation improved after learning in all conditions where participants were permitted to correct task errors, and did not improve whenever we prevented correction of task errors. Thus, previous correction of task errors was both necessary and sufficient to improve adaptation. In contrast, a history of sensory prediction errors was neither sufficient nor obligatory for improved adaptation. Limiting movement preparation time showed that the latent memories driven by learning to correct task errors take at least two forms: a time-consuming but flexible component, and a rapidly expressible, inflexible component. The results provide strong support for the idea that movement corrections driven by a failure to successfully achieve movement goals underpin motor memories that manifest as savings. Such persistent memories are not exclusively mediated by time-consuming strategic processes but also comprise a rapidly expressible but inflexible component. The distinct characteristics of these putative processes suggest dissociable underlying mechanisms, and imply that identification of the neural basis for adaptation and savings will require methods that allow such dissociations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansImaginationMaleMemoryMental RecallPsychomotor PerformanceRotationYoung Adultmotor learningmotor memoriessavingssensorimotor adaptationvisuomotor rotation

Identifiers

PMID32029533
PMCPMC7141883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.