ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020
Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- The decay and consolidation of effector-independent motor memories.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Article
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Locomotor savings relies on attentional control of walking in older, but not younger adults.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Protection of savings by reducing the salience of opposing errors.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Time Alters Distinct Memories Driven by Sensory Prediction Errors and Task Errors in Sensorimotor Adaptation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Adaptation response to pitch shift during speech is attenuated upon relearning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Attenuation of implicit motor learning with consecutive exposure to visual errors.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Meta-learning of human motor adaptation via the dorsal premotor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Limb-related sensory prediction errors and task-related performance errors facilitate human sensorimotor learning through separate mechanisms.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Dopamine Increases Accuracy and Lengthens Deliberation Time in Explicit Motor Skill Learning.eNeuro · 2024Article
- A software tool for at-home measurement of sensorimotor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Exploring the role of task success in implicit motor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Reinforcement learning establishes a minimal metacognitive process to monitor and control motor learning performance.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Exploring the role of task success in implicit motor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Bridging event-related potentials with behavioral studies in motor learning.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Review
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation on the dorsal premotor cortex facilitates human visuomotor adaptation.Neuroreport · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional views of sensorimotor adaptation (i.e., adaptation of movements to perturbed sensory feedback) emphasize the role of automatic, implicit correction of sensory prediction errors. However, latent memories formed during sensorimotor adaptation, manifest as improved relearning (e.g., savings), have recently been attributed to strategic corrections of task errors (failures to achieve task goals). To dissociate contributions of task errors and sensory prediction errors to latent sensorimotor memories, we perturbed target locations to remove or enforce task errors during learning and/or test, with male/female human participants. Adaptation improved after learning in all conditions where participants were permitted to correct task errors, and did not improve whenever we prevented correction of task errors. Thus, previous correction of task errors was both necessary and sufficient to improve adaptation. In contrast, a history of sensory prediction errors was neither sufficient nor obligatory for improved adaptation. Limiting movement preparation time showed that the latent memories driven by learning to correct task errors take at least two forms: a time-consuming but flexible component, and a rapidly expressible, inflexible component. The results provide strong support for the idea that movement corrections driven by a failure to successfully achieve movement goals underpin motor memories that manifest as savings. Such persistent memories are not exclusively mediated by time-consuming strategic processes but also comprise a rapidly expressible but inflexible component. The distinct characteristics of these putative processes suggest dissociable underlying mechanisms, and imply that identification of the neural basis for adaptation and savings will require methods that allow such dissociations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.