Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029511›Full record

ArticleJournal of lipid research2020

A novel NanoBiT-based assay monitors the interaction between lipoprotein lipase and GPIHBP1 in real time.

Shwetha K Shetty, Rosemary L Walzem, Brandon S J Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lipid research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lipoprotein Lipase and Its Regulators: An Unfolding Story.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shwetha K ShettyDepartment of Biochemistry, Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center and Obesity Research and Education Initiative, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-8040
Rosemary L WalzemDepartment of Poultry Science and Faculty of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.
Brandon S J DaviesDepartment of Biochemistry, Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center and Obesity Research and Education Initiative, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242 Brandon-davies@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7168-8522
University of Iowa · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Regulation of GPIHBP1-dependent and independent triglyceride clearanceR01HL130146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI DAVIES, BRANDON SCOTT JOSEPH · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hydrolysis of triglycerides in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by LPL is critical for the delivery of triglyceride-derived fatty acids to tissues, including heart, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissues. Physiologically active LPL is normally bound to the endothelial cell protein glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high-density lipoprotein binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1), which transports LPL across endothelial cells, anchors LPL to the vascular wall, and stabilizes LPL activity. Disruption of LPL-GPIHBP1 binding significantly alters triglyceride metabolism and lipid partitioning. In this study, we modified the NanoLuc® Binary Technology split-luciferase system to develop a novel assay that monitors the binding of LPL to GPIHBP1 on endothelial cells in real time. We validated the specificity and sensitivity of the assay using endothelial lipase and a mutant version of LPL and found that this assay reliably and specifically detected the interaction between LPL and GPIHBP1. We then interrogated various endogenous and exogenous inhibitors of LPL-mediated lipolysis for their ability to disrupt the binding of LPL to GPIHBP1. We found that angiopoietin-like (ANGPTL)4 and ANGPTL3-ANGPTL8 complexes disrupted the interactions of LPL and GPIHBP1, whereas the exogenous LPL blockers we tested (tyloxapol, poloxamer-407, and tetrahydrolipstatin) did not. We also found that chylomicrons could dissociate LPL from GPIHBP1 and found evidence that this dissociation was mediated in part by the fatty acids produced by lipolysis. These results demonstrate the ability of this assay to monitor LPL-GPIHBP1 binding and to probe how various agents influence this important complex.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayCell LineChylomicronsEndothelial CellsFatty AcidsLipoprotein LipaseOrlistatProtein BindingRatsReceptors, LipoproteinChylomicronsFatty AcidsGPIHBP1 protein, ratLipoprotein LipaseOrlistatReceptors, Lipoproteinchylomicronsendothelial cellglycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high density lipoprotein binding protein 1lipolysislipoprotein metabolismNanoLuc® Binary Technologytriglyceride

Identifiers

PMID32029511
PMCPMC7112140
OpenAlexW3005337599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.