Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029493›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block for analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Kun Peng, Min Zeng, Jia Dong, Xiang Yan, Dexiang Wang, Shu Li, Yuming Peng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04036812 (Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Analgesia After Craniotomy Via Suboccipital Retrosigmoid Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04036812 nacompletednot on this map

Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Analgesia After Craniotomy Via Suboccipital Retrosigmoid Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled106ConditionsPlexus Block, Analgesia, NeurosurgeryArmsSuperficial cervical plexus block, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kun PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Min ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia DongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiang YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dexiang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5625-067X
Yuming PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China florapym766@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2630-2467
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScalp nerve block has been proven to be an alternative choice to opioids in multimodal analgesia. However, for the infratentorial space-occupying craniotomy, especially the suboccipital retrosigmoid craniotomy, scalp nerve block is insufficient. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, paralleled-group controlled trial. Patients scheduled to receive elective suboccipital retrosigmoid craniotomy will be randomly assigned to the superficial cervical plexus block group or the control group. After anaesthesia induction, superficial cervical plexus nerve block will be performed under the guidance of ultrasound. The primary outcome is the cumulative consumption of sufentanil by the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump within 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the cumulative consumption of sufentanil at other four time points and numerical rating scale pain severity score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol (version number: 2.0, 10 April 2019) has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of China Registered Clinical Trials (Ethics Review No. ChiECRCT-20190047). The findings of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04036812.

Indexed as

Cervical Plexus BlockUltrasonography, InterventionalAdolescentAdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalChinaCraniotomyHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAnesthetics, Localanalgesiacraniotomysuperficial cervical plexus blockultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32029493
PMCPMC7044881
OpenAlexW3005423461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.