Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029488›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Availability and Quality of Assessment Instruments on Patient-Centredness in the Multimorbid Elderly (AQuA-PCE): a study protocol of a systematic review.

Manuela Glattacker, Manuela Kanat, Jonas Schaefer, Edith Motschall, Laura Kivelitz, Sebastian Voigt-Radloff, Joerg Dirmaier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manuela GlattackerSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany manuela.glattacker@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-2201
Manuela KanatSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jonas SchaeferSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Edith MotschallInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Laura KivelitzDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian Voigt-RadloffCenter for Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Freiburg, Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Joerg DirmaierDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElderly, multimorbid patients are a primary target group for patient-centred care, and fostering patient-centredness (PC) in this group has been associated with different healthcare aims such as safety and quality of healthcare. However, evidence on effects of patient-centred interventions is still limited and mixed. In part, the lack of consistent evidence has its roots in a conceptual uncertainty of the term 'PC', which also hampers the development of assessment tools for PC. Consequently, reviews on assessment instruments of PC reveal problems regarding the quality of identified assessment instruments and regarding their comparability. Some of these reviews focus on the elderly. However, while the concept of multimorbidity is partly inherent, this focus is not explicit in any of the reviews.The aim of this systematic review is to identify assessment instruments of PC in the multimorbid elderly, using a subgroup-specific definition of PC ('subgroup-specific integrative model of PC') as the conceptual underpinning, and to provide a critical quality appraisal of their psychometric properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive systematic literature search for assessment tools on PC will be conducted in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and PSYNDEX electronic databases. The search strategy will be informed by the subgroup-specific integrative model of PC. The electronic literature search will be complemented by a hand-search combining citation tracking, search in project databases, and contacting authors from relevant studies/reviews. The literature search (systematic and hand-search) will cover the period from November, 2018 to December 2019.The retrieval of relevant studies will be conducted via title screening, abstract screening, and full-text eligibility assessment applying defined inclusion criteria. Full texts will be independently assessed by two team members. Data from the included articles will be extracted using a standardised extraction form and evaluated based on the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures, which focuses on the methodological quality of included studies as well as on the measurement properties of the assessment instruments. Data extraction and quality assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Freiburg (reference number 587/17). The results of the project will be disseminated via scientific oral presentations at national and international conferences and will be published in scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: CRD42018084057; DRKS00013309.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityResearch DesignAgedGeriatric AssessmentHumansPatient-Centered CarePsychometricsQuality Assurance, Health CareSystematic Reviews as Topicassessment instrumentsmultimorbid elderlypatient-centrednesssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32029488
PMCPMC7044947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.