ArticleBMJ open2020
Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for fatigue in people with kidney failure requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- A randomized prospective cross over study on the effects of medium cut-off membranes on T cellular and serologic immune phenotypes in hemodialysis.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- The Role of Online Hemodiafiltration in Contemporary Kidney Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Review
- Hemodiafiltration beyond the CONVINCE trial.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- A systematic review of economic models comparing in-centre haemodialysis interventions: challenges for demonstrating cost-effectiveness in the context of high background dialysis costs.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Assessment of patient perspectives in the CONVINCE trial in end-stage kidney disease - a domain-guided approach.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Impact of Hemodiafiltration Versus Hemodialysis on Uremic Symptoms, Physical Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- High-Volume Hemodiafiltration Versus High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review for the Clinician.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Analysis of the application effect of the Clark comfortable nursing approach in hemodialysis patients with end stage renal failure.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Hemodiafiltration May Be Associated with Senescence-Related Phenotypic Alterations of Lymphocytes, Which May Predict Mortality in Patients Undergoing Dialysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Hemodiafiltration for children with stage 5 chronic kidney disease: technical aspects and outcomes.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Review
- Article
- Innovations of renal replacement techniques at the intersection of clinical trial and real-world data.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Proceedings of a membrane update symposium: advancements, scientific insights, and future trends for dialysis membranes for enhanced clinical outcomes in end stage kidney disease patients.Frontiers in nephrology · 2024Article
- High-Target Hemodiafiltration Convective Dose Achieved in Most Patients in a 6-Month Intermediary Analysis of the CONVINCE Randomized Controlled Trial.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Left-sided valvular heart disease in dialysis recipients: a single-centre observational study.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Physical performance tasks were linked to the PROMIS physical function metric in patients undergoing hemodialysis.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEnd-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years' follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.