Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029479›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2020

Structure-based group A streptococcal vaccine design: Helical wheel homology predicts antibody cross-reactivity among streptococcal M protein-derived peptides.

Michelle P Aranha, Thomas A Penfound, Jay A Spencer, Rupesh Agarwal, Jerome Baudry, James B Dale, Jeremy C Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Vaccines · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle P AranhaDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States maranha@utk.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8230-5726
Thomas A PenfoundDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States.
Jay A SpencerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-8100
Rupesh AgarwalDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States.
Jerome BaudryDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.
James B DaleDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9860-9233
Jeremy C SmithDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USUniversity of Alabama in Huntsville · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Structure-Based Design of a Broadly Protective Group A Streptococcal VaccineR01AI132117 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI DALE, JAMES B. · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group A streptococcus (Strep A) surface M protein, an α-helical coiled-coil dimer, is a vaccine target and a major determinant of streptococcal virulence. The sequence-variable N-terminal region of the M protein defines the M type and also contains epitopes that promote opsonophagocytic killing of streptococci. Recent reports have reported considerable cross-reactivity among different M types, suggesting the prospect of identifying cross-protective epitopes that would constitute a broadly protective multivalent vaccine against Strep A isolates. Here, we have used a combination of immunological assays, structural biology, and cheminformatics to construct a recombinant M protein-based vaccine that included six Strep A M peptides that were predicted to elicit antisera that would cross-react with an additional 15 nonvaccine M types of Strep A. Rabbit antisera against this recombinant vaccine cross-reacted with 10 of the 15 nonvaccine M peptides. Two of the five nonvaccine M peptides that did not cross-react shared high sequence identity (≥50%) with the vaccine peptides, implying that high sequence identity alone was insufficient for cross-reactivity among the M peptides. Additional structural analyses revealed that the sequence identity at corresponding polar helical-wheel heptad sites between vaccine and nonvaccine peptides accurately distinguishes cross-reactive from non-cross-reactive peptides. On the basis of these observations, we developed a scoring algorithm based on the sequence identity at polar heptad sites. When applied to all epidemiologically important M types, this algorithm should enable the selection of a minimal number of M peptide-based vaccine candidates that elicit broadly protective immunity against Strep A.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigen-Antibody ReactionsAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCluster AnalysisCross ReactionsEpitopesPeptidesProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalRabbitsStreptococcus pyogenesVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier ProteinsEpitopesPeptidesstreptococcal M proteinVaccines, Syntheticbioinformaticscoiled coilcross-reactive epitopeheptad site identityhumoral responseM proteinsmultivalent vaccineStreptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes)structural biologyvaccinevaccine development

Identifiers

PMID32029479
PMCPMC7086045
OpenAlexW3005424844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.