ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020
Clinical Experience of 1-Minute Brain MRI Using a Multicontrast EPI Sequence in a Different Scan Environment.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elective one-minute full brain multi-contrast MRI versus brain CT in pediatric patients: a prospective feasibility study.BMC medical imaging · 2024Trial
- A Pilot Feasibility Study of Neurodevelopmental Surveillance After the Fontan Operation Using a Sedation-Free Brain MRI Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Focused Abbreviated Survey Technique (FAST) brain magnetic resonance imaging in children: results from a European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Can multicontrast ultrafast brain MRI assist residents to triage intracranial emergencies with structured reporting?Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Ultrafast MRI for Pediatric Brain Assessment in Routine Clinical Practice.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Ultrafast Brain MRI at 3 T for MS: Evaluation of a 51-Second Deep Learning-Enhanced T2-EPI-FLAIR Sequence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting Hypoperfusion Lesion and Target Mismatch in Stroke from Diffusion-weighted MRI Using Deep Learning.Radiology · 2023Article
- A 78 Seconds Complete Brain MRI Examination in Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
- Tissue volume estimation and age prediction using rapid structural brain scans.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Optimization of magnetization transfer contrast for EPI FLAIR brain imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Rapid processing and quantitative evaluation of structural brain scans for adaptive multimodal imaging.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Current Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroradiology: An Overview.Frontiers in radiology · 2021Review
- Multi-contrast echo-planar imaging sequence (Echo-planar imaging mix) in clinical situations demanding faster MRI-brain scans.Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe long scan time of MR imaging is a major drawback limiting its clinical use in neuroimaging; therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of a 1-minute full-brain MR imaging using a multicontrast EPI sequence on a different MR imaging scanner than the ones previously reported. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 146 patients who underwent a multicontrast EPI sequence, including T1-FLAIR, T2-FLAIR, T2WI, DWI, and T2*WI sequences. Two attending neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of each sequence to compare the multicontrast EPI sequence with routine MR imaging protocols. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test to compare the 2 MR imaging protocols.
resultsThe multicontrast EPI sequence generally showed sufficient image quality of >2 points using a 4-point assessment scale. Regarding image quality and susceptibility artifacts, there was no significant difference between the multicontrast EPI sequence DWI and routine DWI (
conclusionsThe multicontrast EPI sequence showed sufficient image quality for clinical use with a shorter scan time; however, it was limited by inferior image quality and frequent susceptibility artifacts compared with routine brain MR imaging. Therefore, the multicontrast EPI sequence cannot completely replace the routine MR imaging protocol at present; however, it may be a feasible option in specific clinical situations such as screening, time-critical diseases or for use with patients prone to motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.