Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029463›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2020

Honeybees fail to discriminate floral scents in a complex learning task after consuming a neonicotinoid pesticide.

Julie A Mustard, Anne Gott, Jennifer Scott, Nancy L Chavarria, Geraldine A Wright

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Power ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie A MustardDepartment of Biology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA.
Anne GottInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Jennifer ScottInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Nancy L ChavarriaDepartment of Biology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA.
Geraldine A WrightInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK geraldine.wright@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-021X
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · USUniversity of Oxford · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S000402/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are pesticides used to protect crops but with known secondary influences at sublethal doses on bees. Honeybees use their sense of smell to identify the queen and nestmates, to signal danger and to distinguish flowers during foraging. Few behavioural studies to date have examined how neonicotinoid pesticides affect the ability of bees to distinguish odours. Here, we used a differential learning task to test how neonicotinoid exposure affects learning, memory and olfactory perception in foraging-age honeybees. Bees fed with thiamethoxam could not perform differential learning and could not distinguish odours during short- and long-term memory tests. Our data indicate that thiamethoxam directly impacts the cognitive processes involved in working memory required during differential olfactory learning. Using a combination of behavioural assays, we also identified that thiamethoxam has a direct impact on the olfactory perception of similar odours. Honeybees fed with other neonicotinoids (clothianidin, imidacloprid, dinotefuran) performed the differential learning task, but at a slower rate than the control. These bees could also distinguish the odours. Our data are the first to show that neonicotinoids have compound specific effects on the ability of bees to perform a complex olfactory learning task. Deficits in decision making caused by thiamethoxam exposure could mean that this is more harmful than other neonicotinoids, leading to inefficient foraging and a reduced ability to identify nestmates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesFlowersGuanidinesInsecticidesLearningMemoryNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionThiamethoxamThiazolesclothianidindinotefuranGuanidinesimidaclopridInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsThiamethoxamThiazolesApis melliferaCholinergic signallingNicotinic acetylcholine receptorOdour discriminationOlfactory learningThiamethoxam

Identifiers

PMID32029463
PMCPMC7075050
OpenAlexW3005509885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.