Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029323›Full record

ArticleVaccine2020

Development of a guinea pig inhalational anthrax model for evaluation of post-exposure prophylaxis efficacy of anthrax vaccines.

Mark R Perry, Boris Ionin, Roy E Barnewall, Michelle L Vassar, Joshua J Reece, Sukjoon Park, Laurence Lemiale, Mario H Skiadopoulos, Jeffry D Shearer, Vladimir Savransky

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Anthrax: A narrative review.New microbes and new infections · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Marmosets as models of infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark R PerryBattelle Biomedical Research Center, 1425 Plain City Georgesville Road, JM7, West Jefferson, OH 46162, USA.
Boris IoninEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.
Roy E BarnewallBattelle Biomedical Research Center, 1425 Plain City Georgesville Road, JM7, West Jefferson, OH 46162, USA.
Michelle L VassarBattelle Biomedical Research Center, 1425 Plain City Georgesville Road, JM7, West Jefferson, OH 46162, USA.
Joshua J ReeceEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.
Sukjoon ParkEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.
Laurence LemialeEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.
Mario H SkiadopoulosEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.
Jeffry D ShearerEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.
Vladimir SavranskyEmergent BioSolutions Inc., 300 Professional Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA. Electronic address: savranskyv@ebsi.com.
Emergent BioSolutions (United States) · USBattelle · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800051C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A next-generation anthrax vaccine candidate, AV7909, is being developed for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of inhalational anthrax in combination with the recommended course of antimicrobial therapy. Clinical efficacy studies of anthrax countermeasures in humans are not ethical or feasible, therefore, licensure of AV7909 for PEP is being pursued under the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Animal Rule, which requires that evidence of effectiveness be demonstrated in an animal model of anthrax, where results of studies in such a model can establish reasonable likelihood of AV7909 to produce clinical benefit in humans. Initial development of a PEP model for inhalational anthrax included evaluation of post-exposure ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability and survival in guinea pigs treated with various ciprofloxacin dosing regimens. Three times per day (TID) intraperitoneal (IP) dosing with 7.5 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin initiated 1 day following inhalational anthrax challenge and continued for 14 days was identified as a well tolerated partially curative ciprofloxacin treatment regimen. The added benefit of AV7909 vaccination was evaluated in guinea pigs given the partially curative ciprofloxacin treatment regimen. Groups of ciprofloxacin-treated guinea pigs were vaccinated. 1 and 8 days post-challenge with serial dilutions of AV7909, a 1:16 dilution of AVA, or normal saline. A group of untreated guinea pigs was included as a positive control to confirm lethal B. anthracis exposure. Post-exposure vaccination with the AV7909 anthrax vaccine candidate administered in combination with the partially curative ciprofloxacin treatment significantly increased survival of guinea pigs compared to ciprofloxacin treatment alone. These results suggest that the developed model can be useful in demonstrating added value of the vaccine for PEP.

Indexed as

AnthraxDisease Models, AnimalPost-Exposure ProphylaxisRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnimalsAnthrax VaccinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinGuinea PigsAnthrax VaccinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinAnimal modelAnthraxCiprofloxacinPost-exposure prophylaxisVaccine

Identifiers

PMID32029323
PMCPMC8905666
OpenAlexW3004372044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.