Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029168›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Dietary methylsulfonylmethane supplementation and oxidative stress in broiler chickens.

M S Abdul Rasheed, M L Oelschlager, B N Smith, L L Bauer, R A Whelan, R N Dilger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  5. Comparison of the Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of Dietary Methyl Sulfonyl Methane in Poultry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Fermentation of NaHCOApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M S Abdul RasheedDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
M L OelschlagerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
B N SmithDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
L L BauerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
R A WhelanEvonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang 63457, Germany.
R N DilgerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Electronic address: rdilger2@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USEvonik (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) is an organic, sulfur-containing compound widely used as a dietary supplement to improve joint health and treat arthritic pain. An experiment was conducted to study the effects of feeding 0.05% MSM to broilers exposed to diet-induced oxidative stress on tissue MSM distribution, growth performance, oxidative stress biomarkers, and immune responsivity. A total of 528 birds were allocated to 4 dietary treatments (fresh oil-no MSM, fresh oil-MSM, oxidized oil-no MSM, oxidized oil-MSM) as provided ad libitum to 11 replicate cages of 12 birds per treatment. Blood and tissue samples were collected to analyze MSM concentrations, and oxidative stress biomarkers including concentrations of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total glutathione, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and reductase (GR) activities. Additionally, blood samples collected at day 25 were used to quantify T-cell (TC) populations using flow cytometry. Overall, MSM was quantified in all tissues and plasma samples of MSM-treated groups at all time points. Oxidized oil reduced (P = 0.006) feed intake over the 21-d feeding period, but MSM did not affect growth equally across time points. No effects (P > 0.2) of MSM or oil type were observed on TC populations. In the presence of oxidized oil, MSM reduced (P = 0.013) plasma TBARS and increased (P = 0.02) liver GPx at day 21, and increased (P = 0.06) liver GR at day 7. Irrespective of dietary oil type, groups supplemented with MSM showed higher plasma TAC at day 7 (P = 0.023), liver GPx activity at day 21 (P = 0.003), and liver GR activity at day 7 (P = 0.004) compared with groups not receiving MSM. In conclusion, 0.05% dietary MSM supplementation partially protected birds from oxidative stress but did not affect immune cell profiles.

Indexed as

Oxidative StressAnimal FeedAnimalsChickensDietDietary SupplementsDimethyl SulfoxideOxidation-ReductionRandom AllocationSulfonesT-Lymphocytesdimethyl sulfoneDimethyl SulfoxideSulfonesbroilerMSMoxidative stressTBARS

Identifiers

PMID32029168
PMCPMC7587734
OpenAlexW3002271237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.