ArticlePoultry science2020
Protection against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella Kentucky exhibited in chickens given both probiotics and live Salmonella vaccine.
Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics as Potential Enhancers of Veterinary Vaccines.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Egg White Biotechnology, Microbiology, and Quality.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Biological treatments for zoonotic salmonellosis: an evolving therapeutic landscape.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Differential Age-Based Response Induced by a Commercial Probiotic Supplementation in Pastured Goats.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Could Exotic Birds Play a Significant Role in the Emergence of Antibiotic-Resistant Microorganisms?Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Layer segmented filamentous bacteria colonize and impact gut health of broiler chickens.mSphere · 2024Article
- Modulatory Effect of Competitive Exclusion on the Transmission of ESBL E. coli in Chickens.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024Article
- Oral Immunization with AttenuatedBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Avian PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Intestinal Helminth Infection Impairs Oral and Parenteral Vaccine Efficacy.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023Article
- Nutritional Strategies to Improve Meat Quality and Composition in the Challenging Conditions of Broiler Production: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Dietary 25-hydroxyvitamin D improves productive performance and intestinal health of laying hens under Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide challenge.Poultry science · 2023Article
- The Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance, immune response, and intestinal barrier function of broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli O157.Poultry science · 2021Article
- Review
- Avian PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- An OMV-Based Nanovaccine Confers Safety and Protection against PathogenicNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Avian PathogenicMicroorganisms · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commercial poultry farms are increasingly threatened by bacterial infections from avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) and broad-host Salmonella serovars. Recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccines (RASV) elicit cross-reactive immune responses against APEC in chickens; however, assessment of broad protection is lacking. Probiotics boost chicken immunity and improve vaccination responses. The objective of this study was to determine whether the RASV, the probiotics, or their combination had protection against APEC and Salmonella. White Leghorn chicks were randomly placed into 4 groups: no treatment (CON), probiotics (PRO), RASV (VAX), or both prophylactics (P + V). Chicks in the PRO and P + V groups were fed probiotics daily, beginning at the age of 1-day-old. Chicks in the P + V and VAX groups were orally inoculated with RASV at the age of 4 D and boosted 2 wks later. Total and antigen-specific IgY responses to Salmonella (lipolysaccharide [LPS]) and E. coli (IroN and IutA) were measured in serum samples via ELISA. Bactericidal potential of both serum and blood against 42 APEC isolates comprising 25 serotypes was assessed in vitro. In vivo protection against APEC was evaluated by air sac challenge with APEC χ7122 (O78:K80), gross pathological lesions were scored, and bacterial loads were enumerated. In a second similar study, birds were orally challenged with S. Kentucky (CVM29188), and feces were enumerated for Salmonella at multiple time points. Vaccination elicited significant LPS-specific antibodies regardless of probiotics (P < 0.0001). Chicks in the P + V group demonstrated increased blood and serum bactericidal abilities against multiple APEC strains in vitro compared with the CON group. Following χ7122 challenge, P+V birds had less APEC in their blood (P < 0.001) and lower signs of airsacculitis (P < 0.01) and pericarditis/perihepatitis (P < 0.05) than CON birds. Finally, only P + V birds were negative for fecal Salmonella at all time points. This study shows this combination treatment may be a feasible method to reduce infection by APEC and Salmonella in chickens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.