Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029153›Full record

ReviewPoultry science2020

Prebiotics and the poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiome.

Steven C Ricke, Sang In Lee, Sun Ae Kim, Si Hong Park, Zhaohao Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Characterization and functionality ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Effect of supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Holistic Strategies to ControlMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven C RickeCenter of Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704; Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701. Electronic address: sricke@uark.edu.
Sang In LeeCenter of Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704; Cell and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Sun Ae KimCenter of Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704.
Si Hong ParkCenter of Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704.
Zhaohao ShiCenter of Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed additives that can modulate the poultry gastrointestinal tract and provide benefit to bird performance and health have recently received more interest for commercial applications. Such feed supplements offer an economic advantage because they may directly benefit poultry producers by either decreasing mortality rates of farm animals, increasing bird growth rates, or improve feed efficieny. They can also limit foodborne pathogen establishment in bird flocks by modifying the gastrointestinal microbial population. Prebiotics are known as non-digestible carbohydrates that selectively stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria, thus improving the overall health of the host. Once prebiotics are introduced to the host, 2 major modes of action can potentially occur. Initially, the corresponding prebiotic reaches the intestine of the chicken without being digested in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract but are selectively utilized by certain bacteria considered beneficial to the host. Secondly, other gut activities occur due to the presence of the prebiotic, including generation of short-chain fatty acids and lactic acid as microbial fermentation products, a decreased rate of pathogen colonization, and potential bird health benefits. In the current review, the effect of prebiotics on the gastrointestinal tract microbiome will be discussed as well as future directions for further research.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChickensDietGastrointestinal TractPrebioticsPrebioticsmicrobiomenon-digestible carbohydratesoligosaccharidespoultry gastrointestinal tractprebiotics

Identifiers

PMID32029153
PMCPMC7587714
OpenAlexW3002725385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.