Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029151›Full record

ReviewPoultry science2020

Influential factors on the composition of the conventionally raised broiler gastrointestinal microbiomes.

K M Feye, M F A Baxter, G Tellez-Isaias, M H Kogut, S C Ricke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K M FeyeSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Service, ARS-USDA, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
M F A BaxterDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
G Tellez-IsaiasDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
M H KogutSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Service, ARS-USDA, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
S C RickeDepartment of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA. Electronic address: sricke@uark.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiome has entered the vernacular of the consumer as well as broiler production and is, therefore, becoming increasingly important to poultry producers to understand. The microbiome is, by definition, compositional and relates to how the microbiological organisms within the gut inhabit that ecological niche. The gut is diverse, flexible, and data acquired requires a greater understanding of the host-microbiome axes, as well as advanced bioinformatics and ecology. There are numerous microbial populations that define the gut microbiome; however, there are even more effects that can influence its composition. As management practices vary between producers, documenting these influences is an essential component of beginning to understand the microbiome. This review targets broiler production and concatenates the currently understood compositional ecology of the broiler gastrointestinal tract microbiome as well as its influences.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChickensGastrointestinal Tractbioinformaticscompositionconventional broiler productiongastrointestinal tractmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID32029151
PMCPMC7587711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.