Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32029146›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Analysis of microbial diversity and composition in small intestine during different development times in ducks.

Chunhong Zhu, Weitao Song, Zhiyun Tao, Hongxiang Liu, Shuangjie Zhang, Wenjuan Xu, Huifang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunhong ZhuJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China. Electronic address: zhuch_1304428@126.com.
Weitao SongJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China.
Zhiyun TaoJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China.
Hongxiang LiuJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China.
Shuangjie ZhangJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China.
Wenjuan XuJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China.
Huifang LiJiangsu Institute of Poultry Science, Jiangsu Yangzhou, 225125, China. Electronic address: lhfxf_002@aliyun.com.
Poultry Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the microbial profiles of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum during different developmental stages in the duck using high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. We also investigated the differences in the microbiota in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum at different developmental times. A correlation analysis was performed between the most abundant bacterial genera and the development of the small intestine. An analysis of alpha diversity indicated different species richness and bacterial diversity in the different small intestinal segments and at different development times. A beta diversity analysis indicated differences in the bacterial community compositions across time. In a weighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis, the samples clustered into two categories, 2 to 4 wk and 6 to 10 wk, in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. Our results show that the small intestine is predominantly populated by the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria throughout the developmental stages of the duck. The duodenum, jejunum, and ileum shared most of the bacterial phyla and genera present, although they showed significant differences in their relative abundances in the intestinal segments and developmental stages. They shared different bacterial taxa during development times and among different segments when the intergroup differences were analyzed. The genera Bacillus, Corynebacterium 1, Lactococcus, Sphingomonas, and Haliangium correlated moderately positively with the increase in bodyweight and the lengths and weights of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, and these genera may be considered important markers when assessing the heath of the intestinal microbiota in ducks. This study provides a foundation upon which to extend our knowledge of the diversity and composition of the duck microbiota and a basis for further studies of the management of the small intestinal microbiota and improvements in the health and production of ducks.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaDucksDuodenumIleumJejunumRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sdiversity and compositionduckmicrobiotasmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID32029146
PMCPMC7587750
OpenAlexW3003023917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.