ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Biomedical event extraction with a novel combination strategy based on hybrid deep neural networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomedical event argument detection method based on multi-feature fusion and question-answer paradigm.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Comparing generative and extractive approaches to information extraction from abstracts describing randomized clinical trials.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Grammar-constrained decoding for structured information extraction with fine-tuned generative models applied to clinical trial abstracts.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Identifying and Analyzing Topic Clusters in a Nutri-, Food-, and Diet-Proteomic Corpus Using Machine Reading.Nutrients · 2023Review
- New reasons for biologists to write with a formal language.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Comparing neural models for nested and overlapping biomedical event detection.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiomedical event extraction is a fundamental and in-demand technology that has attracted substantial interest from many researchers. Previous works have heavily relied on manual designed features and external NLP packages in which the feature engineering is large and complex. Additionally, most of the existing works use the pipeline process that breaks down a task into simple sub-tasks but ignores the interaction between them. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel event combination strategy based on hybrid deep neural networks to settle the task in a joint end-to-end manner.
resultsWe adapted our method to several annotated corpora of biomedical event extraction tasks. Our method achieved state-of-the-art performance with noticeable overall F1 score improvement compared to that of existing methods for all of these corpora.
conclusionsThe experimental results demonstrated that our method is effective for biomedical event extraction. The combination strategy can reconstruct complex events from the output of deep neural networks, while the deep neural networks effectively capture the feature representation from the raw text. The biomedical event extraction implementation is available online;http://www. PREDICTOR: xin/event_extraction;http://2013.bionlp-st.org/tasks;http://nactem.ac.uk/MLEE/.Otherwise, please provide alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.