Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32028625›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Depth Density Achieves a Better Result for Semantic Segmentation with the Kinect System.

Hanbing Deng, Tongyu Xu, Yuncheng Zhou, Teng Miao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanbing DengCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Tongyu XuCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Yuncheng ZhouCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Teng MiaoCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31601218National Natural Science Foundation of China 31601219National Natural Science Foundation of China 61673218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image segmentation is one of the most important methods for animal phenome research. Since the advent of deep learning, many researchers have looked at multilayer convolutional neural networks to solve the problems of image segmentation. A network simplifies the task of image segmentation with automatic feature extraction. Many networks struggle to output accurate details when dealing with pixel-level segmentation. In this paper, we propose a new concept: Depth density. Based on a depth image, produced by a Kinect system, we design a new function to calculate the depth density value of each pixel and bring this value back to the result of semantic segmentation for improving the accuracy. In the experiment, we choose Simmental cattle as the target of image segmentation and fully convolutional networks (FCN) as the verification networks. We proved that depth density can improve four metrics of semantic segmentation (pixel accuracy, mean accuracy, mean intersection over union, and frequency weight intersection over union) by 2.9%, 0.3%, 11.4%, and 5.02%, respectively. The result shows that depth information produced by Kinect can improve the accuracy of the semantic segmentation of FCN. This provides a new way of analyzing the phenotype information of animals.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAlgorithmsAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPhenotypeSemanticsdepth densityfully convolutional networksKinectsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID32028625
PMCPMC7038701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.