ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials in Reading: A Review.
Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Typical and Atypical Development of Visual Expertise for Print as Indexed by the Visual Word N1 (N170w): A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- During natural vision, semantic novelty modulates fixation-related processing in primate cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience.Psychophysiology · 2026Review
- Fast hierarchical processing of orthographic and semantic parafoveal information during natural reading.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Coregistration of eye movements and EEG reveals frequency effects of words and their constituent characters in natural silent Chinese reading.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The state of the art in assessing mental fatigue in the cockpit using head-worn sensing technology.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2025Review
- An early effect of the parafoveal preview on post-saccadic processing of English words.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Naturalistic reading of multi-page texts elicits spatially extended modulation of oscillatory activity in the right hemisphere.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Looking for immediate and downstream evidence of lexical prediction in eye movements during reading.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Occlusal effects on text reading: an eye-tracker study.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2024Article
- An eye on semantics: a study on the influence of concreteness and predictability on early fixation durations.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024Article
- Eye Movement Evidence for Simultaneous Cognitive Processing in Reading.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fast and Slow Rhythms of Naturalistic Reading Revealed by Combined Eye-Tracking and Electroencephalography.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brain Source Correlates of Speech Perception and Reading Processes in Children With and Without Reading Difficulties.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural evidence for lexical parafoveal processing.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present review is addressed to researchers in the field of reading and psycholinguistics who are both familiar with and new to co-registration research of eye movements (EMs) and fixation related-potentials (FRPs) in reading. At the outset, we consider a conundrum relating to timing discrepancies between EM and event related potential (ERP) effects. We then consider the extent to which the co-registration approach might allow us to overcome this and thereby discriminate between formal theoretical and computational accounts of reading. We then describe three phases of co-registration research before evaluating the existing body of such research in reading. The current, ongoing phase of co-registration research is presented in comprehensive tables which provide a detailed summary of the existing findings. The thorough appraisal of the published studies allows us to engage with issues such as the reliability of FRP components as correlates of cognitive processing in reading and the advantages of analysing both data streams (i.e., EMs and FRPs) simultaneously relative to each alone, as well as the current, and limited, understanding of the relationship between EM and FRP measures. Finally, we consider future directions and in particular the potential of analytical methods involving deconvolution and the potential of measurement of brain oscillatory activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.