ArticleMedicine2020
Quality of life of rural poor elderly in Anhui, China.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mediating roles of activities of daily living and depression in the relationship between pain and sleep duration among rural older adults in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Relationship between social capital and quality of life among adult stroke patients: a cross-sectional study in Anhui Province, China.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is to explore the quality of life (QoL) of the rural poor elderly in central China (Anhui province) and the influencing factors.A multi-stage random sampling method was used to extract 3352 effective samples of the rural elderly in Anhui, including 1206 poor and 2146 non-poor elderly subjects. Euro QoL 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) was used for the measurement of QoL. Descriptive statistics and χ test were used to compare and analyze the sociodemographic characteristics and QoL scores between poor and non-poor elderly. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the influencing factors of QoL.There were significant differences in gender, age, education levels, professions, chronic diseases, physical discomfort within 2 weeks, hospitalization within 1 year, economic sources, and migrant workers between the rural poor and non-poor elderly groups. The QoL of rural poor elderly scored significantly higher than the non-poor elderly, in all these five dimensions. The average EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) of poor elderly was 65.689, lower than the non-poor elderly (71.039). After controlling the confounding factors, there was a significant statistical difference in the total utility score of EQ-5D between the poor and non-poor elderly groups.The QoL of poor elderly in central China is lower than non-poor elderly, with the worst dimension of pain/discomfort. The QoL of rural poor elderly in this area could be affected by many factors, to which more attention should be paid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.