Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32028078›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2020

Assessing gait efficacy in older adults: An analysis using item response theory.

Subashan Perera, Jessie VanSwearingen, Valerie Shuman, Jennifer S Brach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Subashan PereraDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: ksp9@pitt.edu.
Jessie VanSwearingenDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA. Electronic address: jessievs@pitt.edu.
Valerie ShumanDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA. Electronic address: vls40@pitt.edu.
Jennifer S BrachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA. Electronic address: jbrach@pitt.edu.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
MIDCAREER INVESTIGATOR AWARD IN TRANSLATIONAL PATIENT-ORIENTED RESEARCH IN AGINGK24AG057728 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BRACH, JENNIFER S · 2018 to 2022
$658k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG057728NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing confidence in walking in older adults is important, as mobility is a critical aspect of independence and function, and self-report provides complementary information to performance-based measures. The modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) is a self-report measure used to examine confidence in walking. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the psychometric properties of the mGES at the item level? Are there opportunities for improvement?

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of baseline data from a cluster randomized trial of 424 community-dwelling older adults and reliability data from 123 participants. We fitted a graded response model to dissect the mGES to the item and individual response level and examined opportunities to improve and possible shorten the mGES. We examined psychometric characteristics such as internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity with respect to other relevant measures.

resultsMobility tasks such as navigating stairs and curbs with separate items for going up and down largely provide the same information on confidence, with downward direction providing slightly more. It may be reasonable to consider removal of walking 1/2 mile, stepping down and/or stair tasks with railings items due to little or duplicate information contributed compared to other items. The shortened scales proposed by removing the above items had similar psychometric properties to mGES. SIGNIFICANCE: The mGES has good psychometric properties, but can be potentially shortened to substantially reduce responder burden. The upward direction curb and stairs items can be removed to result in a 7-item scale with virtually no loss of desirable psychometrics. An alternative 3-item version, level surface walking, stepping down curb and climbing up stairs without a railing items, entails only a minimal loss in psychometric properties.

Indexed as

GaitSelf EfficacySelf ReportAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStair ClimbingSurveys and QuestionnairesWalkingWalking SpeedWalk TestConfidence in walkingGait efficacyItem response theoryPsychometric propertiesRasch

Identifiers

PMID32028078
PMCPMC7061088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.