Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027833›Full record

ReviewNeuron2020

Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks.

Uri Hasson, Samuel A Nastase, Ariel Goldstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The neuroscience of transformers.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A solution to generalized learning from small training sets found in infants' repeated visual experiences of individual objects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensory encoding of emotion conveyed by the face and visual context.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Computational origins of shape perception.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. Electronic address: hasson@princeton.edu.
Samuel A NastasePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Ariel GoldsteinPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Speaker-listener coupling: a novel neural approach for assessing communicationDP1HD091948 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HASSON, URI · 2016 to 2021
$5.6M
Brain-to-brain dynamical Coupling: A New framework for the communication of social knowledgeR01MH112566 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HASSON, URI, WHEATLEY, THALIA P · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD091948NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution is a blind fitting process by which organisms become adapted to their environment. Does the brain use similar brute-force fitting processes to learn how to perceive and act upon the world? Recent advances in artificial neural networks have exposed the power of optimizing millions of synaptic weights over millions of observations to operate robustly in real-world contexts. These models do not learn simple, human-interpretable rules or representations of the world; rather, they use local computations to interpolate over task-relevant manifolds in a high-dimensional parameter space. Counterintuitively, similar to evolutionary processes, over-parameterized models can be simple and parsimonious, as they provide a versatile, robust solution for learning a diverse set of functions. This new family of direct-fit models present a radical challenge to many of the theoretical assumptions in psychology and neuroscience. At the same time, this shift in perspective establishes unexpected links with developmental and ecological psychology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionNeural Networks, ComputerBrainHumansLearningNerve Netevolutionexperimental designinterpolationlearningneural networks

Identifiers

PMID32027833
PMCPMC7096172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.