Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027768›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2020

What men want: Qualitative analysis of what men with prostate cancer (PCa) want to learn regarding genetic referral, counseling, and testing.

Samantha Greenberg, Stacey Slager, Brock O' Neil, Kathleen Cooney, Benjamin Maughan, Nicole Stopa, Vickie Venne, Susan Zickmund, Sarah Colonna

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha GreenbergHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-4994-4793
Stacey SlagerDepartment of Urology, University of Utah School of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Brock O' NeilHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-5824
Kathleen CooneyDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3831-6943
Benjamin MaughanHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-8551
Nicole StopaKaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado.
Vickie VenneGenomic Medicine Service VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-9043-3920
Susan ZickmundVA HSR&D Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-9811
Sarah ColonnaHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-6990
University of Utah · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · USDuke University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Competition, Bundled Care Payment, and Low-Value Cancer CareK08CA234431 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI O'NEIL, BROCK · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234431NCI NIH HHS K08CA234431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines have changed recently to include genetic counseling (GC) and/or genetic testing (GT) for all men with aggressive prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to identify what information men with PCa desire before and from GC.

methodsFocus groups were conducted with men who have PCa. Audio recordings were analyzed for themes related to GT, the information they desired from health care providers, and implications for family members.

resultsThirty-seven men with PCa participated in seven focus groups. Nearly all men felt GT was beneficial and impactful for their family and themselves. Most men were unaware of the risks to female relatives associated with hereditary cancer. Participants discussed that genetics should be incorporated at an appropriate time of their diagnostic journey.

conclusionThis study showed that men valued GC and GT for personal and familial implications, and often did not associate PCa genetics with risk for female relatives to develop cancer. Consideration should be given to the GC timing in regard to where men are in their treatment process. Providers referring patients can leverage patient motivations and utilize their relationship with the patient to determine the appropriate timing and personalize discussion with the patient regarding GC and GT.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEvaluation Studies as TopicGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicProstatic NeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationBRCA1/2genetic counselinggermline mutationsprostate cancer genetics

Identifiers

PMID32027768
PMCPMC8195313
OpenAlexW3005275838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.