Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027717›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The impact of deceased donor maintenance on delayed kidney allograft function: A machine learning analysis.

Silvana Daher Costa, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade, Francisco Victor Carvalho Barroso, Cláudia Maria Costa de Oliveira, Elizabeth De Francesco Daher, Paula Frassinetti Castelo Branco Camurça Fernandes, Ronaldo de Matos Esmeraldo, Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Artificial intelligence and kidney transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana Daher CostaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Luis Gustavo Modelli de AndradeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Victor Carvalho BarrosoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Cláudia Maria Costa de OliveiraWalter Cantídio University Hospital, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Elizabeth De Francesco DaherDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Paula Frassinetti Castelo Branco Camurça FernandesWalter Cantídio University Hospital, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ronaldo de Matos EsmeraldoHospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Tainá Veras de Sandes-FreitasDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-0614
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRHospital Universitário Walter Cantídio · BRHospital Geral de Fortaleza · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) in a country where its incidence is high, detailing donor maintenance-related (DMR) variables and using machine learning (ML) methods beyond the traditional regression-based models.

methodsA total of 443 brain dead deceased donor kidney transplants (KT) from two Brazilian centers were retrospectively analyzed and the following DMR were evaluated using predictive modeling: arterial blood gas pH, serum sodium, blood glucose, urine output, mean arterial pressure, vasopressors use, and reversed cardiac arrest.

resultsMost patients (95.7%) received kidneys from standard criteria donors. The incidence of DGF was 53%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, DMR variables did not impact on DGF occurrence. In post-hoc analysis including only KT with cold ischemia time<21h (n = 220), urine output in 24h prior to recovery surgery (OR = 0.639, 95%CI 0.444-0.919) and serum sodium (OR = 1.030, 95%CI 1.052-1.379) were risk factors for DGF. Using elastic net regularized regression model and ML analysis (decision tree, neural network and support vector machine), urine output and other DMR variables emerged as DGF predictors: mean arterial pressure, ≥ 1 or high dose vasopressors and blood glucose.

conclusionsSome DMR variables were associated with DGF, suggesting a potential impact of variables reflecting poor clinical and hemodynamic status on the incidence of DGF.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsBrazilCold IschemiaDelayed Graft FunctionHumansIncidenceKidney TransplantationMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID32027717
PMCPMC7004552
OpenAlexW3004656597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.