Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Healthcare practitioners' views of social media as an educational resource.

Adam G Pizzuti, Karan H Patel, Erin K McCreary, Emily Heil, Christopher M Bland, Eric Chinaeke, Bryan L Love, P Brandon Bookstaver

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Content analysis of oral hygiene instruction posts on Instagram: a cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025
    Article
  6. From Engagement to Concerns: Social Media Use Among a Sample of Australian Public Health Professionals.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Twitter trends in #Parasitology determined by text mining and topic modelling.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Video or text? Education through a social media website in hypertension.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2022
    Article
  20. The role of dermatologists in social media: exploring the benefits and risks.Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Adam G PizzutiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-0030
Karan H PatelKaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Erin K McCrearyUniversity of Wisconsin Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Emily HeilUniversity of Maryland College of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Christopher M BlandUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Eric ChinaekeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Bryan L LoveDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
P Brandon BookstaverDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
University of South Carolina · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Wisconsin Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media is increasingly utilized as a resource in healthcare. We sought to identify perceptions of using social media as an educational tool among healthcare practitioners. An electronic survey was distributed to healthcare administrators, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, physicians, and physician assistants f hospital systems and affiliated health science schools in Georgia, Maryland, South Carolina, and Wisconsin. Survey questions evaluated respondents' use and views of social media for educational purposes and workplace accessibility using a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Nurses (75%), pharmacists (11%), and administrators (7%) were the most frequent respondents. Facebook® (27%), Pinterest® (17%), and Instagram® (17%) were the most frequently accessed social media platforms. Nearly 85% agreed or strongly agreed that social media can be an effective tool for educational purposes. Among those who had social media platforms, 43.0% use them for educational purposes. Pinterest® (30%), Facebook® (22%), LinkedIn® (16%), and Twitter® (14%) were most frequently used for education. About 50% of respondents had limited or no access to social media at work. Administrators, those with unlimited and limited work access, and respondents aged 20-29 and 30-39 years were more likely to agree that social media is an educational tool (OR: 3.41 (95% CI 1.31 to 8.84), 4.18 (95% CI 2.30 to 7.60), 1.66 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.25), 4.40 (95% CI 2.80 to 6.92), 2.14 (95% CI 1.53 to 3.01) respectively). Residents, physicians, and those with unlimited access were less likely to agree with allowing social media access at work for educational purposes only. Healthcare practitioners frequently utilize social media, and many believe it can be an effective educational tool in healthcare.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPerceptionSocial MediaAdultEducation, ContinuingFemaleGeorgiaHumansInformation DisseminationInternship and ResidencyMaleMarylandNurse PractitionersPharmacistsPhysician AssistantsPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID32027686
PMCPMC7004337
OpenAlexW3005501277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.