Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027653›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Constraints on microbial communities, decomposition and methane production in deep peat deposits.

Laurel A Kluber, Eric R Johnston, Samantha A Allen, J Nicholas Hendershot, Paul J Hanson, Christopher W Schadt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurel A KluberBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.
Eric R JohnstonBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-7711
Samantha A AllenBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-2834
J Nicholas HendershotBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.
Paul J HansonClimate Change Sciences Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.
Christopher W SchadtBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8759-2448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peatlands play outsized roles in the global carbon cycle. Despite occupying a rather small fraction of the terrestrial biosphere (~3%), these ecosystems account for roughly one third of the global soil carbon pool. This carbon is largely comprised of undecomposed deposits of plant material (peat) that may be meters thick. The fate of this deep carbon stockpile with ongoing and future climate change is thus of great interest and has large potential to induce positive feedback to climate warming. Recent in situ warming of an ombrotrophic peatland indicated that the deep peat microbial communities and decomposition rates were resistant to elevated temperatures. In this experiment, we sought to understand how nutrient and pH limitations may interact with temperature to limit microbial activity and community composition. Anaerobic microcosms of peat collected from 1.5 to 2 meters in depth were incubated at 6°C and 15°C with elevated pH, nitrogen (NH4Cl), and/or phosphorus (KH2PO4) in a full factorial design. The production of CO2 and CH4 was significantly greater in microcosms incubated at 15°C, although the structure of the microbial community did not differ between the two temperatures. Increasing the pH from ~3.5 to ~5.5 altered microbial community structure, however increases in CH4 production were non-significant. Contrary to expectations, N and P additions did not increase CO2 and CH4 production, indicating that nutrient availability was not a primary constraint in microbial decomposition of deep peat. Our findings indicate that temperature is a key factor limiting the decomposition of deep peat, however other factors such as the availability of O2 or alternative electron donors and high concentrations of phenolic compounds, may also exert constraints. Continued experimental peat warming studies will be necessary to assess if the deep peat carbon bank is susceptible to increased temperatures over the longer time scales.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaTemperatureCarbon CycleCarbon DioxideClimate ChangeMethaneSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbon DioxideMethaneSoil

Identifiers

PMID32027653
PMCPMC7004313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.