ArticleTurkish journal of urology2019
Is voiding cystourethrography necessary for evaluating unilateral ectopic pelvic kidney?
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate if voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is necessary for the evaluation of unilateral ectopic pelvic kidney (UEPK) in order to identify vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIAL AND
methodsFiles of the patients who had been followed-up for ectopic pelvic kidney in two pediatric nephrology clinics between August 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Other anomalies, such as crossed, fused, and bilateral pelvic ectopia were excluded. Preliminary diagnoses were made via urinary ultrasonography while dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy was carried out to confirm the diagnoses. Differential renal function and presence of renal scars was checked. VCUG results were obtained and those patients that showed VUR were noted.
resultsA total of 72 patients were included in the study (41 males and 31 females). The median patient age was 4.1 years (range: 2 months-14.5 years). Hydronephrosis was present in only 4 patients (5.6%), where 1 one of those was on the contralateral side. UEPKs contributed to the mean 37.9±7.8% of total renal function and 15% of these patients had renal scars (expressed as a global reduction in function, not as patchy scars). VCUG was obtained in 42 patients and VUR was present in only 1 patient (2.4%). The median follow-up period was 16.5 months (range: 3-92 months).
conclusionThe results of our study indicated that hydronephrosis and VUR are not common in UEPKs. Therefore, routine VCUG should be avoided in the evaluation of UEPK in order to protect patients from unnecessary radiation exposure and an increased risk of urinary tract infections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.