Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027491›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicinal chemistry2020

Two Decades of Successful SAR-Grounded Stories of the Novel Bacterial Topoisomerase Inhibitors (NBTIs).

Anja Kolarič, Marko Anderluh, Nikola Minovski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structural Aspects ofACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  10. mLife · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anja KolaričLaboratory for Cheminformatics, Theory Department, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marko AnderluhChair of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1768-8246
Nikola MinovskiLaboratory for Cheminformatics, Theory Department, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0039-2246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of bacterial resistance against life-saving medicines has forced the scientific community and pharmaceutical industry to take actions in the quest for novel antibacterials. These should not only overcome the existing bacterial resistance but also provide at least interim effective protection against emerging bacterial infections. Research into DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV inhibitors has become a particular focus, with the description of a new class of bacterial topoisomerase type II inhibitors known as "novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors", NBTIs. Elucidation of the key structural modifications incorporated into these inhibitors and the impact these can have on their general physicochemical properties are detailed in this review. This defines novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors with promising antibacterial activities and potencies, which thus represent one potential example of the future "drugs for bad bugs", as identified by the World Health Organization.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBinding SitesCatalytic DomainDNA GyraseDNA Topoisomerase IVMolecular Dynamics SimulationStructure-Activity RelationshipTopoisomerase InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA GyraseDNA Topoisomerase IVTopoisomerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32027491
PMCPMC7307926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.