Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027444›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2020

Changes in Neuronal Activity in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Primary Somatosensory Cortex With Nonlinear Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Julia C Quindlen-Hotek, Alexander R Kent, Patrisia De Anda, Sonia Kartha, Alexander M Benison, Beth A Winkelstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multicentre, clinical trial of burst spinal cord stimulation for neck and upper limb pain NU-BURST: a trial protocol.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Improved Psychosocial and Functional Outcomes and Reduced Opioid Usage Following Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia C Quindlen-HotekDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-3011
Alexander R KentApplied Research, Abbott Laboratories, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Patrisia De AndaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sonia KarthaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander M BenisonNeuromodulation, Abbott Laboratories, Austin, TX, USA.
Beth A WinkelsteinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-0484
University of Pennsylvania · USAbbott (United States) · US

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
BRIAN INJURY TRAINING GRANTT32NS043126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Douglas Hamilton Smith · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Abbott Laboratories noneNIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619NINDS NIH HHS NS043126NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS043126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough nonlinear burst and tonic SCS are believed to treat neuropathic pain via distinct pain pathways, the effectiveness of these modalities on brain activity in vivo has not been investigated. This study compared neuronal firing patterns in the brain after nonlinear burst and tonic SCS in a rat model of painful radiculopathy.

methodsNeuronal activity was recorded in the ACC or S1 before and after nonlinear burst or tonic SCS on day 7 following painful cervical nerve root compression (NRC) or sham surgery. The amplitude of nonlinear burst SCS was set at 60% and 90% motor threshold to investigate the effect of lower amplitude SCS on brain activity. Neuronal activity was recorded during and immediately following light brush and noxious pinch of the paw. Change in neuron firing was measured as the percent change in spikes post-SCS relative to pre-SCS baseline.

resultsACC activity decreases during brush after 60% nonlinear burst compared to tonic (p < 0.05) after NRC and compared to 90% nonlinear burst (p < 0.04) and pre-SCS baseline (p < 0.03) after sham. ACC neuron activity decreases (p < 0.01) during pinch after 60% and 90% nonlinear burst compared to tonic for NRC. The 60% of nonlinear burst decreases (p < 0.02) ACC firing during pinch in both groups compared to baseline. In NRC S1 neurons, tonic SCS decreases (p < 0.01) firing from baseline during light brush; 60% nonlinear burst decreases (p < 0.01) firing from baseline during brush and pinch.

conclusionsNonlinear burst SCS reduces firing in the ACC from a painful stimulus; a lower amplitude nonlinear burst appears to have the greatest effect. Tonic and nonlinear burst SCS may have comparable effects in S1.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaSpinal Cord StimulationAnimalsGyrus CinguliNeuronsRatsSomatosensory CortexSpinal CordBurst stimulationcingulate cortexneuropathic painsomatosensory cortexspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32027444
PMCPMC7771032
OpenAlexW3004944224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.