Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027353›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2020

Association of Germline Genetic Testing Results With Locoregional and Systemic Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Allison W Kurian, Kevin C Ward, Paul Abrahamse, Ann S Hamilton, Dennis Deapen, Monica Morrow, Reshma Jagsi, Steven J Katz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GermlinePathology oncology research : POR · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reporting tumor genomic test results to SEER registries via linkages.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Allison W KurianDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Kevin C WardDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Paul AbrahamseDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Ann S HamiltonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Dennis DeapenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Monica MorrowDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Steven J KatzDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Southern California · USEmory University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Genetic testing, treatment use, and mortality after diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer: The Georgia-California GeneLINK InitiativeR01CA225697 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, STEVEN J., KURIAN, ALLISON W. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The increasing use of germline genetic testing may have unintended consequences on treatment. Little is known about how women with pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes are treated for breast cancer. Objective: To determine the association of germline genetic testing results with locoregional and systemic therapy use in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this population-based cohort study, data from women aged 20 years or older who were diagnosed with stages 0 to III breast cancer between 2014 and 2016 were accrued from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries of Georgia and California. The women underwent genetic testing within 3 months after diagnosis and were reported to the Georgia and California SEER registries by December 1, 2017. Exposures: Pathogenic variant status based on linked results of clinical germline genetic testing by 4 laboratories that did most such testing in the studied regions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Potential deviation of treatment from practice guidelines was assessed in the following clinical scenarios: (1) surgery: receipt of bilateral mastectomy by women eligible for less extensive unilateral surgery (unilateral breast tumor); (2) radiotherapy: omission in women indicated for postlumpectomy radiotherapy (all lumpectomy recipients except age ≥70 with stage I, estrogen and/or progesterone receptor [ER/PR] positive, ERBB2 [formerly HER2]-negative disease); and (3) chemotherapy: receipt by women eligible to consider chemotherapy omission (stages I-II, ER/PR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and 21-gene recurrence score of 0-30, which was the upper limit of the intermediate risk range during the study years). The adjusted percentage treated and adjusted odds ratio (OR) are reported based on multivariable modeling for each treatment-eligible group. Results: A total of 20 568 women (17.3%) of 119 198 were eligible (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [12.2]). Compared with women whose test results were negative, those with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were more likely to receive bilateral mastectomy for a unilateral tumor (61.7% vs 24.3%; OR, 5.52, 95% CI, 4.73-6.44), less likely to receive postlumpectomy radiotherapy (50.2% vs 81.5%; OR, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.15-0.32), and more likely to receive chemotherapy for early-stage, ER/PR-positive disease (38.0% vs 30.3%; OR, 1.76, 95% CI, 1.31-2.34). Similar patterns were seen with pathogenic variants in other breast cancer-associated genes (ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, NF1, PALB2, PTEN, and TP53) but not with variants of uncertain significance. Conclusions and Relevance: Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and other breast cancer-associated genes were found to have distinct patterns of breast cancer treatment; these may be less concordant with practice guidelines, particularly for radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32027353
PMCPMC7042883
OpenAlexW3004572568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.