Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32027072›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2020

A systematic review of UK-based long-term nonsurgical interventions for people with severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg m

M Aceves-Martins, C Robertson, D Cooper, A Avenell, F Stewart, P Aveyard, M de Bruin, REBALANCE team

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of UK-based long-term nonsurgical interventions for people with severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg mJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Aceves-MartinsHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9441-142X
C RobertsonHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
D CooperHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
A AvenellHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
F StewartHealth Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
P AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
M de BruinIQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
REBALANCE team

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this project was to systematically review UK evidence on the effectiveness of long-term (≥12 months) weight management services (WMSs) for weight loss and weight maintenance for adults (≥16 years) with severe obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg m

methodsFour data sources were searched from 1999 to October 2018.

resultsOur searches identified 20 studies, mostly noncomparative studies: 10 primary care interventions, nine in secondary care specialist weight management clinics and one commercial setting intervention. A programme including a phase of low energy formula diet (810-833 kcal day

conclusionsThere is a persistent and clear need for guidance on long-term weight data collection and reporting methods to allow comparisons across studies and services for participants with severe obesity. Data could also include quality of life, clinical outcomes, adverse events, costs and economic outcomes. A randomised trial comparison of National Health Service Tier 3 services with commercial WMSs would be of value.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBariatricsBehavior TherapyBody Mass IndexDiet, ReducingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidState MedicineTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomWeight Reduction ProgramsYoung AdultBMI ≥35 kg m−2severe obesityUKweight management programmes

Identifiers

PMID32027072
PMCPMC7317792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.