ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2020
A Tale of Two Desolvation Potentials: An Investigation of Protein Behavior under High Hydrostatic Pressure.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Behavior of Proteins under Pressure from Experimental Pressure-Dependent Structures.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrostatic pressure is a common perturbation to probe the conformations of proteins. There are two common forms of pressure-dependent potentials of mean force (PMFs) derived from hydrophobic molecules available for coarse-grained molecular simulations of protein folding and unfolding under hydrostatic pressure. Although both PMFs include a desolvation barrier separating the direct contact well and the solvent-mediated contact well, how these features vary with hydrostatic pressure is still debated. There is a need for a systematic comparison of these two PMFs on a protein. We investigated the two different pressure-dependencies on the desolvation potential in a structure-based protein model using coarse-grained molecular simulations. We compared the simulation results to the known behavior of proteins based on experimental evidence. We showed that the protein's folding transition curve on the pressure-temperature phase diagram depends on the relationship between the potential well minima and pressure. For a protein that reduces its total volume under pressure, the PMF needs to carry the feature that the direct contact well is less stable than the water-mediated contact well at high pressure. We also comment on the practicality and importance of structure-based minimalist models for understanding the phenomenological behavior of proteins under a wide range of phase space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.