Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026568›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2020

The impact of maternal supplementation during pregnancy and the first 6 months postpartum on the growth status of the next child born after the intervention period: Follow-up results from Bangladesh and Ghana.

Katherine P Adams, Seth Adu-Afarwuah, Malay K Mridha, Brietta M Oaks, Susana L Matias, Charles D Arnold, Sika M Kumordzie, Harriet Okronipa, Maku E Ocansey, Kathryn G Dewey

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Katherine P AdamsDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-2473
Seth Adu-AfarwuahDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-2720-5474
Malay K MridhaSchool of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Brietta M OaksDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Susana L MatiasDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Charles D ArnoldDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Sika M KumordzieDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Harriet OkronipaDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-6754
Maku E OcanseyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9275-7526
Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
University of California, Davis · USBRAC University · BDUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy and breastfeeding make demands on maternal nutrient stores. The extent of depletion and the degree to which nutrient stores are replenished between pregnancies has implications for a mother's nutritional status at conception of the subsequent child and therefore that child's birth outcomes and growth. Using follow-up data collected several years after a randomized effectiveness trial conducted in rural Bangladesh and a randomized efficacy trial conducted in semiurban Ghana, we evaluated the impact of maternal supplementation with small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) or multiple micronutrients (MMN) through pregnancy (the index pregnancy) and 6 months postpartum on the growth status of the next living younger sibling conceived and born after the index pregnancy. In both Bangladesh (n = 472 younger siblings) and Ghana (n = 327 younger siblings), there were no overall differences in the growth status or the prevalence of undernutrition among younger siblings whose mothers had received LNS (or MMN, Ghana only) during and after the index pregnancy compared with the younger siblings of mothers who had received iron plus folic acid (IFA) during the index pregnancy (Ghana) or during and for 3 months after the index pregnancy (Bangladesh). These findings do not indicate that preconception nutrition interventions do not improve child growth. Rather, they suggest that any benefits of maternal LNS or MMN supplementation during one pregnancy and for 6 months postpartum are unlikely to extend to the growth of her next child beyond any effects due to IFA alone.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsNutritional StatusAdultBangladeshChildChild DevelopmentChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolFemaleFolic AcidFollow-Up StudiesGhanaHumansIronMaleMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaFolic AcidIronBangladeshchild growthGhananutrient supplementspreconception nutrition

Identifiers

PMID32026568
PMCPMC7083484
OpenAlexW3004761651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.