Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026463›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2020

From random to regular: Variation in the patterning of retinal mosaics.

Patrick W Keeley, Stephen J Eglen, Benjamin E Reese

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A complete spatial map of mouse retinal ganglion cells reveals density and gene expression specializations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of Retinal Astroglia.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adaptive Optics Imaging of Inherited Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mutant-Dependent Local Orientational Correlation in Biofilms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick W KeeleyNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-498X
Stephen J EglenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Benjamin E ReeseNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California.
University of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Development of Retinal Bipolar CellsR01EY019968 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI REESE, BENJAMIN E · 2010 to 2023
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The various types of retinal neurons are each positioned at their respective depths within the retina where they are believed to be assembled as orderly mosaics, in which like-type neurons minimize proximity to one another. Two common statistical analyses for assessing the spatial properties of retinal mosaics include the nearest neighbor analysis, from which an index of their "regularity" is commonly calculated, and the density recovery profile derived from autocorrelation analysis, revealing the presence of an exclusion zone indicative of anti-clustering. While each of the spatial statistics derived from these analyses, the regularity index and the effective radius, can be useful in characterizing such properties of orderly retinal mosaics, they are rarely sufficient for conveying the natural variation in the self-spacing behavior of different types of retinal neurons and the extent to which that behavior generates uniform intercellular spacing across the mosaic. We consider the strengths and limitations of these and other spatial statistical analyses for assessing the patterning in retinal mosaics, highlighting a number of misconceptions and their frequent misuse. Rather than being diagnostic criteria for determining simply whether a population is "regular," they should be treated as descriptive statistics that convey variation in the factors that influence neuronal positioning. We subsequently apply multiple spatial statistics to the analysis of eight different mosaics in the mouse retina, demonstrating conspicuous variability in the degree of patterning present, from essentially random to notably regular. This variability in patterning has both a developmental as well as a functional significance, reflecting the rules governing the positioning of different types of neurons as the architecture of the retina is assembled, and the distinct mechanisms by which they regulate dendritic growth to generate their characteristic coverage and connectivity.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsDendritesHumansMiceRetinaautocorrelationdensity recovery profileeffective radiusnearest neighborpacking factorregularity indexRRID AB_10013783RRID AB_10064230RRID AB_2079751RRID AB_213554RRID AB_2187701RRID AB_309969RRID AB_397958RRID AB_90755Voronoi domain

Identifiers

PMID32026463
PMCPMC7368823
OpenAlexW2982091748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.