ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2020
From random to regular: Variation in the patterning of retinal mosaics.
Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photodisruption of the Inner Limiting Membrane Promotes Retinal Engraftment of Stem-Cell Derived Retinal Ganglion Cells.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- A complete spatial map of mouse retinal ganglion cells reveals density and gene expression specializations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of Retinal Astroglia.Annual review of vision science · 2025Review
- Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Maternal Diabetes: Autophagy and Spatial Arrangement of Hippocampal Neurons.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- A standardized nomenclature for the rods and cones of the vertebrate retina.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Dscamb regulates cone mosaic formation in zebrafish via filopodium-mediated homotypic recognition.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The first interneuron of the mouse visual system is tailored to the natural environment through morphology and electrical coupling.iScience · 2024Article
- Retinal neurons establish mosaic patterning by excluding homotypic somata from their dendritic territories.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Optimization-Based Pairwise Interaction Point Process (O-PIPP): A Precise and Universal Retinal Mosaic Modeling Approach.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Pten regulates endocytic trafficking of cell adhesion and Wnt signaling molecules to pattern the retina.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Grafted Sertoli cells prevent neuronal cell death and memory loss induced by seizures.Metabolic brain disease · 2023Article
- Retinal neurons establish mosaic patterning by excluding homotypic somata from their dendritic territory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Adaptive Optics Imaging of Inherited Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023Review
- Retinal self-organization: a model of retinal ganglion cells and starburst amacrine cells mosaic formation.Open biology · 2023Article
- A melanopsin ganglion cell subtype forms a dorsal retinal mosaic projecting to the supraoptic nucleus.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Mutant-Dependent Local Orientational Correlation in Biofilms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The various types of retinal neurons are each positioned at their respective depths within the retina where they are believed to be assembled as orderly mosaics, in which like-type neurons minimize proximity to one another. Two common statistical analyses for assessing the spatial properties of retinal mosaics include the nearest neighbor analysis, from which an index of their "regularity" is commonly calculated, and the density recovery profile derived from autocorrelation analysis, revealing the presence of an exclusion zone indicative of anti-clustering. While each of the spatial statistics derived from these analyses, the regularity index and the effective radius, can be useful in characterizing such properties of orderly retinal mosaics, they are rarely sufficient for conveying the natural variation in the self-spacing behavior of different types of retinal neurons and the extent to which that behavior generates uniform intercellular spacing across the mosaic. We consider the strengths and limitations of these and other spatial statistical analyses for assessing the patterning in retinal mosaics, highlighting a number of misconceptions and their frequent misuse. Rather than being diagnostic criteria for determining simply whether a population is "regular," they should be treated as descriptive statistics that convey variation in the factors that influence neuronal positioning. We subsequently apply multiple spatial statistics to the analysis of eight different mosaics in the mouse retina, demonstrating conspicuous variability in the degree of patterning present, from essentially random to notably regular. This variability in patterning has both a developmental as well as a functional significance, reflecting the rules governing the positioning of different types of neurons as the architecture of the retina is assembled, and the distinct mechanisms by which they regulate dendritic growth to generate their characteristic coverage and connectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.