Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026429›Full record

ArticlePulmonary therapy2019

Treatment Patterns of New Users of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol in Asthma and COPD in UK Primary Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Daniel Dedman, Sonia J Coton, Rebecca E Ghosh, Wilhelmine Meeraus, Courtney Crim, Catherine Harvey, Justyna Amelio, Sarah H Landis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel DedmanClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK. Daniel.Dedman@mhra.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-5391
Sonia J CotonClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK.
Rebecca E GhoshClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK.
Wilhelmine MeerausGlaxoSmithKline plc, Epidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK.
Courtney CrimGlaxoSmithKline plc, Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Catherine HarveyGlaxoSmithKline plc, Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK.
Justyna AmelioGlaxoSmithKline plc, Epidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, Stevenage, UK.
Sarah H LandisGlaxoSmithKline plc, Epidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK.
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBClinical Practice Research Datalink · GBResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline plc 205052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis retrospective database study explored treatment patterns and potential off-label prescribing among patients newly prescribed fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) in a UK primary care setting.

methodsIn Europe, FF/VI is approved in two strengths: 100/25 µg for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 100/25 µg or 200/25 µg for treatment of asthma in patients aged 12 or older. Using electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, new users of FF/VI or other inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist fixed-dose combination products were identified and classified into one of three groups: COPD diagnosis, asthma diagnosis, and other diagnosis (not COPD or asthma).

resultsDuring 2014-2015, 4373 patients initiated FF/VI: 3380 on FF/VI 100/25 (65% in the COPD diagnosis group) and 993 on FF/VI 200/25 (51% in the asthma diagnosis group). During up to 12 months of follow-up, the median number (interquartile range) of prescriptions of the index strength issued per patient was 7 (2-8) for FF/VI 100/25 and 5 (2-8) for FF/VI 200/25; most new users did not change from the index strength prescribed (93.0% COPD; 89.7% asthma, of all patients initiating treatment with FF/VI). Potential off-label FF/VI prescribing in children < 12 years old was rare (< 0.29% in the combined asthma and other diagnosis groups), and up to one in five new users of FF/VI with COPD were potentially prescribed FF/VI 200/25 off-label during the study period. Much of the potential off-label prescribing in COPD occurred in patients with a history of asthma, those presenting with greater disease severity, and/or prior treatment with high-dose steroids.

conclusionsThe prescription of FF/VI is rare in children under 12 years of age in the UK, according to our findings, but up to one in five COPD patients in the UK may have been prescribed FF/VI 200/25, some of which may have been off-label.

fundingThis study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline plc (study 205052). STUDY REGISTRATION: GlaxoSmithKline plc Clinical Trial Registry study number 205052.

Indexed as

AsthmaChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI)Primary care

Identifiers

PMID32026429
PMCPMC6967316
OpenAlexW2940533140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.