Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026398›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before-after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.

Niccolò Surci, Marco Ramera, Alex Borin, Giovanni Marchegiani, Roberto Salvia, Claudio Bassi, SPaRo Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multidisciplinary treatment of cancer.Updates in surgery · 2021
    Article
  8. Defining and Treating Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Niccolò SurciDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Marco RameraDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Alex BorinDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni MarchegianiDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Roberto SalviaDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Claudio BassiDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. claudio.bassi@univr.it.
SPaRo Group
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indication, planning, and risk analysis of a pancreatic surgical procedure have recently become increasingly complex. In December 2015, the "Pancreas Round" (PR) meeting was established at our institution to preoperatively review all scheduled cases with a specific focus on surgical indications and technical issues. The present study aims to determine the impact of the PR on the clinical practice in terms of avoiding unrequested laparotomies and anticipating intraoperative pitfalls. A "before-after" study was conducted by retrospectively comparing a pre-intervention period (9/2014-11/2015) to a prospectively assessed post-intervention one (12/2015-3/2017). Outcomes considered were explorative laparotomy (EL) occurrence and a "mismatch" between what was preoperatively expected by the PR and what was intraoperatively found. Of the 1057 patients included in the present study, 531 underwent surgery in the pre- and 526 in the post-intervention period, respectively. The EL rate was comparable between the two periods (15.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.123), despite the significant increase of surgical explorations after neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the post-intervention period (27% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). The "mismatch" rate between preoperative planning and intraoperative findings was significantly reduced in the post-intervention period (12.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.038) compared to the pre-PR period. In the setting of a high-volume center, a preoperative surgical meeting designed to review all cases scheduled for surgical exploration can enhance the level of care by addressing intraoperative pitfalls.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesPancreatectomyQuality ImprovementRisk AssessmentHumansLaparotomyPatient CarePreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesBefore–after studyPancreatic surgeryPreoperative planningSurgical team meeting

Identifiers

PMID32026398
OpenAlexW3004927475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.