ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020
Assessment of neonaticide in the setting of concealed and denied pregnancies.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a new understanding of pregnancy denial: the misunderstood dissociative disorder.Archives of women's mental health · 2022Review
- Pictorial review of the postmortem computed tomography in neonaticide cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Review
- Implementing post-mortem computed tomography in the assessment of neonaticide.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2020Article
- Response to "Implementing post-mortem computed tomography in the assessment of neonaticide" by Ducloyer et al.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is known that concealed and denied pregnancy are both associated with increased health risks to the mother and infant. Whilst there is literature surrounding management and safeguarding in these instances, we are not aware of a case review of post-mortem findings in infants with a history of concealed or denied pregnancy. We performed a retrospective review of all coronial post-mortems performed between 2003 and 2018 on infants and fetuses with a history of concealment or denial of pregnancy. Maternal demographics, delivery information, post-mortem findings and results of ancillary investigations were analyzed. Twenty cases (1.8% of total coronial workload in the period of the study) were included. Four women admitted to concealing their pregnancy, eleven denied their pregnancy and in the remaining five cases the bodies of the infants had been abandoned and the mother was not traceable. The bodies of these infants were found in waste disposal sites, wooded areas and in a drainpipe. Only six infants in total were judged to have survived delivery, all others were stillborn or unascertained. Perinatal hypoxia, large subdural hemorrhage and congenital pneumonia were the reported causes of death in those infants that were liveborn. In one case there was suspicion of neonaticide. Concealment and denial of pregnancy occur in a wider demographic than perhaps anticipated and is not limited to teenage primigravids. Mothers with concealed and denied pregnancy hid the body of their deceased infant out of fear of prosecution. In many circumstances, viability at birth cannot be ascertained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32026385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.