Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026385›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020

Assessment of neonaticide in the setting of concealed and denied pregnancies.

Sophie Stenton, Marta C Cohen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie StentonHistopathology Department, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS FT, Sheffield, UK.
Marta C CohenHistopathology Department, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS FT, Sheffield, UK. Marta.Cohen@nhs.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5534-444X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that concealed and denied pregnancy are both associated with increased health risks to the mother and infant. Whilst there is literature surrounding management and safeguarding in these instances, we are not aware of a case review of post-mortem findings in infants with a history of concealed or denied pregnancy. We performed a retrospective review of all coronial post-mortems performed between 2003 and 2018 on infants and fetuses with a history of concealment or denial of pregnancy. Maternal demographics, delivery information, post-mortem findings and results of ancillary investigations were analyzed. Twenty cases (1.8% of total coronial workload in the period of the study) were included. Four women admitted to concealing their pregnancy, eleven denied their pregnancy and in the remaining five cases the bodies of the infants had been abandoned and the mother was not traceable. The bodies of these infants were found in waste disposal sites, wooded areas and in a drainpipe. Only six infants in total were judged to have survived delivery, all others were stillborn or unascertained. Perinatal hypoxia, large subdural hemorrhage and congenital pneumonia were the reported causes of death in those infants that were liveborn. In one case there was suspicion of neonaticide. Concealment and denial of pregnancy occur in a wider demographic than perhaps anticipated and is not limited to teenage primigravids. Mothers with concealed and denied pregnancy hid the body of their deceased infant out of fear of prosecution. In many circumstances, viability at birth cannot be ascertained.

Indexed as

DeceptionDenial, PsychologicalInfanticideAdolescentAdultAsphyxia NeonatorumFemaleFetal HypoxiaHematoma, SubduralHumansInfant, NewbornLive BirthNervous System MalformationsPneumoniaPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAutopsyConcealed pregnancyDenied pregnancyNeonaticide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.