ArticleFolia microbiologica2020
Screening of pectinase-producing bacteria from farmlands and optimization of enzyme production from selected strain by RSM.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome study ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Multi enzyme production and alginate encapsulation from Bacillus subtilis for stable feed additives.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Statistical bioprocess optimization for enhanced production of a thermo alkalophilic polygalacturonase (PGase) fromHeliyon · 2023Article
- Effect of Warm-Water Retting Pretreatment on the Physical Properties of Banana Stem and Its Fibre.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Isolation and characterization of pectinase-producing bacteria (Serratia marcescens) from avocado peel waste for juice clarification.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Conversion of Pectin-Containing By-Products to Pectinases byPolymers · 2021Article
- Vibrational Spectroscopic Analyses and Imaging of the Early Middle Ages Hemp Bast Fibres Recovered from Lake Sediments.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectinolytic enzymes that catalyze the breakdown of substrates containing pectin are widespread. Pectinases have potential applications in various industries, including food, animal feed, textile, paper, and fuel. In this study, one hundred bacterial isolates were collected from Marand city farmlands (Azarbaijan-E-Sharqi, Iran) and screened by MP medium on the base of pectinase activity considering the significance of pectinases. The results depicted that three isolates showed the most pectinase activity (more massive halo). The biochemical and molecular test results showed that the three screened bacteria were Enterobacter and named Enterobacter sp. MF41, Enterobacter sp. MF84, and Enterobacter sp. MF90. Enterobacter sp. MF84 had the largest halo, so this strain was selected for the study of its produced pectinase. The results exhibited that the produced enzyme has optimum temperature and pH for activity at 30 °C and in 9, respectively. Finally, the enzyme production by Enterobacter sp. MF84 is optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) considering four factors (NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.